Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal

["Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1372 bytes --]

On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:01:51 +0200
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 24/02/13 16:17, hasufell wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 02/24/2013 11:11 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> >> On 24/02/2013 11:06, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> Then don't put 'autotools' in the name.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >
> > That would be multilib-minimal.eclass then?
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> > ABCD also suggested something else:
> > autotools-multilib.eclass -> autotools-utils-multilib.eclass
> 
> This makes sense too, autotools-multilib.eclass is misleading as it 
> embeds the "unrelated" autotools-utils.eclass
> 
> So it seems currently that some are against this eclass, some are 
> against the whole idea and favour multilib-portage, some are against 
> using autotools-utils.eclass for this, ...
> Some people are already committing the eclass version changes/fixes to 
> tree, some are filing bug reports about bugs caused by it, ...
> 
> It would be nice if people agreed but I guess that is not happening, so 
> i'll be pushing this eclass to tree under name 'multilib-minimal.eclass' 
> if I don't hear compelling arguments for not doing so, or in case you 
> push it before me

No, don't do it. Or at least wait till I clean up multilib-build a bit.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 966 bytes --]