From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 060FE198005 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06811E06BE; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECB7DE064A for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:07:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n12so6516722oag.41 for ; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:07:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Y5yMvyMUhSIJa2YnbkTjvYsxEEd+7su3TAbkX5ill2g=; b=sJuc/jWJsvEhtObkMdIPNCZU9rnWVsLT2Od1gXXwCFB9zlUMNP35hzp+O1TdZ6zbtO qlOpHydO4PAx+qUDlWUfONGfEEc9sMiuu1qpAeK12ILpDzTimqDq4R5zxAwKIQDuneln Y4eLntzpH7dlXFDzEwHwILVko0tDiti1rXtn4czuP49jZQUTnYcG5mf1RYJWhcI6DHa4 tUr/cGo2RM+eSkwv666tOWRZ4jbO9KDgBRaLWOIbu4rFZMVpPYc3GJnkk6oCeqBWzQM5 tUC/EIyzYBInwEMwlComNUdq0UC5dKYSy/2l5j8RhTNl+dMJzP8QMcgbhBjavtDsuEJh RmpA== X-Received: by 10.60.31.193 with SMTP id c1mr207119oei.63.1361923671087; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:07:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-88-199.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.88.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm4590080oev.5.2013.02.26.16.07.47 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:07:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:07:46 -0600 Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:07:46 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Evaluating a new malloc() Message-ID: <20130227000746.GA31311@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <512CB9B8.9060308@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 125a290b-2eab-4407-a2b4-138e4eacdc4b X-Archives-Hash: 8a5b02d82556d1e0c4a355bd459abd2c --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:10:09AM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > > In terms of 'following Gentoo policy.' We encourage packages to be as > > close to upstream as possible. I cannot fathom why when you basically > > find a performance bug in malloc, you start a thread on the list about > > replacing it; as opposed to filing a bug against glibc or emailing the > > glibc lists and asking them about it. >=20 > We may not understand it, but it does completely fit ryao's typical > modus operandi. I must second this unfortunately. William --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEtTlIACgkQblQW9DDEZTiMMQCeMbualDh6NiyUpTa/hT+n/uiK wNIAnifgsI4fjpRxChFm8HC7gthEf2ff =qXap -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--