From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:22:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130224132252.115bc260@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51296027.705@gentoo.org>
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:34:47 +0100
hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Some people seem to feel uncomfortable with autotools-multilib,
> because it depends on autotools-utils.
To be honest, I don't particularly like autotools-utils, I tend to
consider it a useless bloat. However, Michal's work on
autotools-multilib is IMHO the right thing to do: If you use the
autotools-utils syntax then it's trivial to support multilib without
useless duplication of code.
I still believe such an eclass as the one you propose is useful, except
it's not for autotools (at best temporary for broken autotools based
build systems): For example, I have no clue how to do multilib with
waf-based build systems without going the 'copy $S and run the usual
src_* phases in each directory for each ABI', which is what your eclass
is abstracting I think.
A.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-24 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-24 0:34 [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-multilib-minimal hasufell
2013-02-24 4:22 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 10:06 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 10:11 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-02-24 14:17 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 14:33 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-27 13:01 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-02-27 20:13 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-27 20:15 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-24 14:57 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 15:12 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 15:12 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-24 15:53 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 16:21 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-02-24 16:28 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-24 16:58 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-02-24 18:56 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 19:40 ` hasufell
2013-02-24 18:05 ` [gentoo-dev] " Jonathan Callen
2013-02-24 18:18 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-24 16:22 ` Alexis Ballier [this message]
2013-02-24 16:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " hasufell
2013-02-24 18:46 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-02-24 22:39 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-02-28 1:06 ` hasufell
2013-02-28 8:30 ` Michał Górny
2013-02-28 15:16 ` hasufell
2013-03-02 2:50 ` hasufell
2013-03-02 15:07 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-02 15:13 ` hasufell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130224132252.115bc260@gentoo.org \
--to=aballier@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox