From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58704-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC5C138B48
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:22:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DD9FE0512;
	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:22:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03DA2E02DF
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:22:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771HX5w==
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05
Received: from pinacolada.localnet
	(95-130-165-88.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.88])
	by smtp.strato.de (joses mo48) (RZmta 31.17 AUTH)
	with ESMTPA id R0210dp1KJIAsF for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:21:52 +0100 (CET)
From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:22:05 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.10.0; x86_64; ; )
References: <robbat2-20130218T224715-868658579Z@orbis-terrarum.net> <m3sj4qq147.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org> <robbat2-20130220T185720-410937256Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
In-Reply-To: <robbat2-20130220T185720-410937256Z@orbis-terrarum.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1435508.uXGLmsQ0HF";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201302202122.11035.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 5000f1e9-7846-400a-acf3-105d2804befc
X-Archives-Hash: f1eb4320f3698bde30baea01bb09b317

--nextPart1435508.uXGLmsQ0HF
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2013, 20:36:22 schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
>=20
> Speed for i7-2600K CPU:
> DSA1024 0.007980s
> DSA2048 0.011940s
> DSA3072 0.013530s
> RSA1024 0.007000s
> RSA2048 0.012290s
> RSA3072 0.018420s
> RSA4096 0.030800s
>=20

Which of course brings up the question, why the hardcoded 4096 limit in=20
GnuPG... but I guess that's not our problem yet.

https://www.google.de/search?q=3Dgnupg+rsa+8192

=2D-=20

Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer=20
dilfridge@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/


--nextPart1435508.uXGLmsQ0HF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlElMHIACgkQ3ao2Zwy3NWpJ3ACePedESQCTOY9D4KNfSujJ7Y0c
wUYAn2J5tHor6g7S2jFTpnnOfCoq9Fm6
=AGVg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1435508.uXGLmsQ0HF--