From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C925138ABA for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B57421C004; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gg0-f171.google.com (mail-gg0-f171.google.com [209.85.161.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712E1E049A for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gg0-f171.google.com with SMTP id j1so430252ggn.30 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:34:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WR5J8E2CIKqOBZ3zIIJn9YuCgzvx2v63MpDdgDASjT0=; b=Bd5aljlebhhze13kopn7u1nwE8jY5Is75UAkLR3rdginqtbaQCs3BFs/a2X1oK1xmI jWYTVVsgBc3HGbM8J5H5t3GoWNOYpeOwc9G9KLKTVli4ZCnTqxR22XGl2y7mc+ksoozt JRQe8Badh88WDlUaQOX/u93OQlcs37knHErF+zt12JoTRZx/MMYU34FI7I/DL2P16k70 sQlJRub5SZSBt8h+uXomiwz8+Lf8E+OnOmBRhN2yBUb78X6qgmsG/L1kde7PgNgMtIsj Z3XUPvTwOOUykK8TV61HMqoh+BR5+FxeloUzygP/O7PStcvE1p2ywei6jGz419H6MNH6 U4wg== X-Received: by 10.101.137.11 with SMTP id p11mr4398332ann.0.1361118850364; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:34:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-88-199.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.88.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b62sm108108839yhf.13.2013.02.17.08.34.06 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:34:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:34:05 -0600 Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 10:34:05 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo Message-ID: <20130217163405.GA2448@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <2415518.JM1V4B20yx@devil> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2415518.JM1V4B20yx@devil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 7b79a1d9-c0bd-4e35-b68a-39ac5c5d4547 X-Archives-Hash: 49bdbc882ef761fd4197cba68702ebff --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:03:43PM +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Now, imho, we have 2 choice: >=20 > 1)Support them with an iso or at least a manual if we can't do an handbook > 2)Lose the stable keyword and don't waste manpower anymore. We also have another choice if there is so little interest in these arch's. 3) get rid of their keywords entirely. If there is no manual, no installation cd, no stages, and no supported way = to install on an arch, why keep it? William --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlEhBn0ACgkQblQW9DDEZTjBPwCcC77v3r64W3GmWgYbUGeD31WS YUIAnRWvdHTrtzjfG+T4WzPYZathx+ja =rDmv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--