From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252EC13899F for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B92E6E0486; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:17:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D30EE0138 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:17:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2558 invoked by uid 501); 11 Feb 2013 15:17:28 -0000 Message-ID: <20130211151728.2557.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:17:28 +0100 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libusb-compat preference in virtual/libusb:0 not strong enough? Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: dbd80e46-5bc8-4ae9-a942-44ae79e5c56d X-Archives-Hash: e5104a7dfff96750b621805a4cbb22e8 Maxim Kammerer wrote: > * These packages depend on libusb: One stands out: > app-crypt/ccid-1.4.8 (usb ? virtual/libusb:1) > app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.19 (usb ? virtual/libusb:0) > dev-libs/openobex-1.5 (usb ? virtual/libusb:0) > media-libs/libmtp-1.1.5 (virtual/libusb:1) > net-libs/libpcap-1.3.0-r1 (canusb ? virtual/libusb) This one has no slotted dependency. Does that matter? In any case it doesn't seem completely correct, since the two APIs are not compatible. > Any idea on what's going on? BFS instead of DFS search when > satisfying "||"? Seems a good explanation.. Can you try swapping the two in the virtual? //Peter