From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2148138968 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36E0321C0B1; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2811321C0A1 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [213.146.33.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CF2333E4A3; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:48:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:48:49 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: patrick@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: media-gfx/picasa, dev-python/papyon, net-voip/telepathy-butterfly, sci-visualization/paraview, x11-misc/xdaf Message-ID: <20130210124849.28034a8c@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <511788EE.1010307@gentoo.org> References: <1360486867.26312.0.camel@belkin4> <511788EE.1010307@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.14; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/4P2IJOCAjxCVPGRX5nSel9Z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: f155d138-be17-4000-976f-5d802c36ed24 X-Archives-Hash: c71dce9546db6981b19cd808ca97469c --Sig_/4P2IJOCAjxCVPGRX5nSel9Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:47:58 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 02/10/2013 05:01 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > # Pacho Ramos (10 Feb 2013) > > # Fails with gcc-4.7, crashes (#301946, #312073), problems with > > # boost (#319921), problems with python-2.7 (#338826), really old > > # version in the tree, people should move to sci overlay one (#424659). > > # Removal in a month. > > sci-visualization/paraview >=20 > So instead of moving things from random overlays to the tree we remove > packages now, remove features from other packages because of that > (openfoam) and then ... tell users to use an overlay? >=20 > Somehow this appears not well thought out to me. Would anyone be > terribly upset if I started pillaging this silly overlay? (And any other > overlays that look like they are fun) +1. If you can't manage moving/updating your packages properly and on-time from the sci overlay, please get rid of it. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/4P2IJOCAjxCVPGRX5nSel9Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlEXiSYACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1MxQP/RrqkdAFo3NIkQvU1yxPeY55F 4wNtruQbXOiFsNZM7YWn2/B6gBbUyDfwBAuzUC/yf0LWHw49mvHV6P+rEnBXctbR a4Gvcx5+8UCnWv1i+1bgfYD0jnPTj6IIwZofEOzyioct3FmYifs9HDuL5/LkD4EU rj+Wx80sPNTejVxecpg= =h6cV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/4P2IJOCAjxCVPGRX5nSel9Z--