From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58082-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099591387B7
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:27:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1FFA21C00B;
Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:27:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9966EE0486
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:27:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8988133DCC2
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:27:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.34
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=-1.231, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.107,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id rrElCOpqgtPt for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:27:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFFA33DCC1
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:27:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-dev@m.gmane.org>)
id 1U19AB-0000iq-KJ
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 06:27:47 +0100
Received: from 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([71.17.69.121])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 06:27:47 +0100
Received: from dirtyepic by 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 06:27:47 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: changes to tested bugzilla keyword proposal
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:37:56 -0600
Organization: Gentoo
Message-ID: <20130131233756.134bb8a1@caribou.gateway.2wire.net>
References: <50ED9802.3060103@carrosses.com>
<CAG2jQ8iRgQeO+4fq8N3=zE0+tPb6R6R62H6KpYVbeM9tBbNObQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20130109180201.57b56cb2@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
boundary="Sig_/Aj+RHX6S8qe=zC/W3=r1Kj+"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.14; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
X-Archives-Salt: 5c9bb677-1d59-4d3d-97eb-0b543e957651
X-Archives-Hash: df13590b2d34c530542c7f51252f7e72
--Sig_/Aj+RHX6S8qe=zC/W3=r1Kj+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 18:02:01 +0100
Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> wrote:
> A lot clearer than a single text field littered with keywords would be so=
me
> tick boxes, indeed. In fact, it makes me wonder why we use a half-obscured
> list in a select field for adding/removing arch teams now.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/213514
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:24:36 -0600
Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On keywording/stabilizing, Bugzilla has a flags feature that might be use=
d to=20
> track what has been tested where.
>
> Flags have three states: +, -, and ?. + and - are obvious, and ? is a
> request. So imagine having a "x86 tested" flag that the maintainer sets to
> "?" to request stabilization of their package. An email is sent to the a=
rch
> alias notifying them of the request. The arch tester tests it out and se=
ts
> the flag to + or - depending on their results. The arch dev stabilizes t=
he
> package as normal.
>=20
> If we added a "Keyword/Stable Request" component to the "Gentoo Linux"
> product we could also have it dependent on that, so only bugs in that
> component would display the flags. We can also make it so only people wi=
th
> editbugs privileges can request or set flags.
--=20
gcc-porting
toolchain, wxwidgets learn a language baby, it's that kind of pl=
ace
@ gentoo.org where low card is hunger and high card is ta=
ste
--Sig_/Aj+RHX6S8qe=zC/W3=r1Kj+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRC1S5AAoJEO04vUmVeoRjVEkH+wXlpO0xrML7NQVjLIFdEr3W
M0XuUAeS7sCsLD8aUu8eueSAVN8KPc41GRIHUIcNERGWrr3On7NCkVW6ZQ5lbIs0
FNwhy2DD/v8U8zYipAd+d5bIluK80KWj9r8m+eI+2FGHo/ebbgsWMP5FDGpY+J3t
hsLUS8PsXall4Tm5fng7p5Wt8x6Pqa+wnUTv2leVlb/C3DNFyu+XyxeDlNFWlwTJ
JydDoJ8cAhjuf3lIZyAKF1329F1LJwaU3upU8XCnspagsz01bdHX85VL56gjLy6A
Pz+7EaAE2LDPAQA1+WSWdzOXXSz9HKIWuGZsW0h8a8Iw9ky/zFEqRnl6tOWWjcg=
=2VW4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/Aj+RHX6S8qe=zC/W3=r1Kj+--