From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-58018-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C761386E5
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:05:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07BF621C08A;
	Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:05:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055E521C033
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:04:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sf (unknown [178.120.34.98])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: slyfox)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB3BD33D937;
	Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:04:57 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:04:14 +0300
From: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: mgorny@gentoo.org, ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The gx86 multilib project -- masterplan
Message-ID: <20130127210414.791b07d6@sf>
In-Reply-To: <20130127173022.031147f5@pomiocik.lan>
References: <20130127161237.1a04614e@pomiocik.lan>
	<20130127160748.3c5d18fb@googlemail.com>
	<20130127173022.031147f5@pomiocik.lan>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/e1z86trt8OuPp1TM8jZEL=c"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 9459e233-dc3b-4dac-b513-486527ed2188
X-Archives-Hash: c9d5c2fa91cc64c5e9a8a7eef28b9076

--Sig_/e1z86trt8OuPp1TM8jZEL=c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 17:30:22 +0100
Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:07:48 +0000
> Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
>=20
> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:12:37 +0100
> > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > >    RDEPEND=3D"dev-libs/libfoo[${MULTILIB_USEDEP}]
> > >        dev-libs/libbar[ssl,${MULTILIB_USEDEP}]"
> >=20
> > This looks like it might be a bit fragile. Is it something better
> > addressed by an EAPI extension?
>=20
> I have no idea. This one's clear and simple. Not sure how you could be
> able to do that better in EAPI.

EAPI might allow lib[multiple?][use?][flags?] as an alias of [multiple?,use=
?,flags?].

--=20

  Sergei

--Sig_/e1z86trt8OuPp1TM8jZEL=c
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlEFbCAACgkQcaHudmEf86rilwCfZxIxovFrskAXQe8RnvfGHIsU
RPQAn3k4N227wSdLo7Tf/MswFU0QaqDG
=Euzu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/e1z86trt8OuPp1TM8jZEL=c--