From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB5513863C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:45:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AEC021C0B0; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1086221C004 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BED333DB09 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:45:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.077 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.075, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PChFVxnDHZB8 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE2A33D929 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:45:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TyBsr-0006hg-JN for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 02:45:41 +0100 Received: from wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net ([174.76.82.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 02:45:41 +0100 Received: from boxcars by wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 02:45:41 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: =?UTF-8?B?wrtRwqs=?= Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: news item for udev 197-r3 upgrade (yes, I know, it's late) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 19:45:37 -0600 Organization: none Message-ID: <20130123194537.52c64ee9@fuchsia.remarqs.net> References: <50FFE241.6030107@gentoo.org> <20130123140215.GI883@ca.inter.net> <50FFEE2E.1010004@flameeyes.eu> <510009C3.6030603@gentoo.org> <20130123134909.0de0aba0@ritchie.cs.ubc.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: wsip-174-76-82-7.no.no.cox.net X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: 7e3bd0f8-80aa-4603-bc9b-849ea1d403fa X-Archives-Hash: 56c716da535ba0ed8457f469d343e735 On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:49:09 -0800 Christopher Head wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:03:15 +0100 > Michael Weber wrote: > > > On 01/23/2013 04:04 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > System seems to work fine, so I'm not sure how essential that line > > > is. The fact that I'm using an initramfs might also have an > > > effect. > > > > I'd strongly suggest using CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y. > > and stop worring about udev/openrc. > > > > udev/openrc stopped re-mounting /dev that last year. > > Are you sure? I have CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT disabled, latest stable > udev (197-r3) and openrc (0.11.8), and no /dev line in my fstab, yet > my /dev is still a devtmpfs with a proper set of device nodes. Me too. It looks like /etc/init.d/udev-mount mounts it if the kernel hasn't, but I'd like to know more about whatever best practice is.