Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting proper USE_EXPAND variable(s) for multilib

["Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1748 bytes --]

On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:03:56 -0300
Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:24:26 +0100
> Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:27:30 -0300
> > Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > > To be honest, I don't know if there's other way to hide USE flags
> > > > than using USE_EXPAND_HIDDEN. If we want to use that, we'd have
> > > > to split the flags per-arch, i.e. have:
> > > > 
> > > >   MULTILIB_AMD64="abi1 abi2 abi3"
> > > >   MULTILIB_PPC64="abi1 abi2 abi3"
> > > > 
> > > > with appropriate USE_EXPAND_HIDDEN set by profiles.
> > > 
> > > I don't like that at all.
> > > I'd go for ABI= the union of all the MULTILIB_ABIS variables (if
> > > there is no name collision)
> > > we certainly want skype to depend on libitneeds[abi_x86], not
> > > 'amd64? ( libitneeds[abi_amd64_x86] ) x86? ( libitneeds )'
> > 
> > Just a quick idea.
> > 
> > How would you feel about abi_x86_32? (similarly _64, _x32)
> > 
> > That would be almost natural names with the trick variable being
> > ABI_X86, therefore having all the fore-mentioned advantages.
> > 
> > The deps would look like:
> > 
> >   libitneeds[abi_x86_32]
> > 
> 
> Sounds good too, I just would want it to be shared between arches that
> can: amd64/x86/x32, ppc/ppc64, mips, sparc32/sparc64, etc.
> You mean you will hide ABI_X86 USE_EXPAND on non-x86 arches, right ?
> This would have all the benefits I think, very good idea :)

Yes.

I'm currently looking for a clean way to hide it without having to
repeat that in a dozen profiles. But it seems that portage and PMS
disagree again about the shape of USE_EXPAND_HIDDEN...

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]