From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF4B1385B3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B255D21C09C; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D9221C010 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24012 invoked by uid 501); 21 Jan 2013 02:28:23 -0000 Message-ID: <20130121022823.24011.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 03:28:23 +0100 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting the general dev opinion ("Meinungsbild") on some feature Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1612544.stxDy4xPvh@porto> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 3d615857-ab10-40bd-a5b7-455b44703f4b X-Archives-Hash: 7b27bf911b3fa0c925eeebafd83d5614 Alec Warner wrote: [..removed 25 lines of quoted text which I had already read..] > The primary complaint was the fact that there is too much email. Many emails are not neccessarily a problem if only they have high signal-to-noise ratio. I have *never* seen so competent people output so incompetent email as on gentoo-dev. It is seriously the worst bunch of lazy-ass email authors that I have ever seen. Sad face. That is of course only *my* opinion. //Peter