From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FFB138578 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D283421C0AB; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net (mail-1.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D577821C034 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:03:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748DB2EA3FA for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail-1.ca.inter.net ([208.85.220.69]) by localhost (offload-3.ca.inter.net [208.85.220.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 031cCePwxXHv for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:03:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from ca.inter.net (unknown [199.91.213.33]) by mail-1.ca.inter.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E74C2EA1B7 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:03:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by ca.inter.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:03:42 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 16:03:42 -0500 From: Philip Webb To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category Message-ID: <20130119210342.GB1066@ca.inter.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <50FAA3C0.6040704@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 61df2a04-dc2a-442a-aa41-ac229eb4f68b X-Archives-Hash: 1eca109ea5592be94616554b8c59e054 130119 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 19 January 2013 21:46, Patrick Lauer wrote: >> Maybe lib-qt ? dev-qt sounds confusing to me too, what's "dev" about it? > These are libraries and applications > that are used by developers of end-user applications. They are also encountered by users when updating KDE etc. > If there is too much opposition to a simple "qt" category > -- at least there seems to be some quite vocal opposition -- , > then dev-qt is in my eyes the next best alternative. 'qt' alone is inconsistent with the rest of the tree. > A third option we came up with is qt-framework. Too long to type & again no parallel in the existing tree. > Somewhat comparable categories in the current tree > are dev-dotnet and gnustep-{base,libs}. Flame-eyes' suggestion is simple, consistent & involves least change : 'x11-qt/qt-core' 'x11-qt/qt-gui' etc. Please do it like that. -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca