public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:15:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130110061512.GA13417@linux1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_kDaZ3A8UfRzyz=Eap8-brnz+8RT=0jUpMhE4_aiHma-A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1113 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:33:42PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell@gmx.com> wrote:
> > So long as users retain the choice of keeping eth* or wlan*, no
> > complaints from me. I (and others) came to Gentoo to get away from
> > systemd, and this smells of a systemd-ism. Will eudev be pursuing this
> > as well?
> 
> Keep in mind that this is a udev announcement, not a eudev
> announcement.  Udev is generally going to follow upstream, so if
> avoiding systemd is your main goal in life you probably will want to
> stick with eudev, which might or might not adopt this feature.
 
For the record, I have no plans of forcing systemd on anyone. I still
maintain OpenRC and plan to continue doing so.

As described on the wiki, it is very simple to turn this feature off
either by adding your own persistent rules in /etc/udev/rules.d or by
overriding the 80-net-slot-name.rules file by putting a file in
/etc/udev/rules.d with that name. So, how is this a "systemd-ism"? a lot
of software has defaults that you can reconfigure.

William

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-10 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-09 22:13 [gentoo-dev] call for testers: udev predictable network interface names William Hubbs
2013-01-09 22:59 ` Christopher Head
2013-01-10  0:13   ` William Hubbs
2013-01-10  0:46     ` Christopher Head
2013-01-12  2:11       ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2013-01-12 17:55         ` Alec Warner
2013-01-12 18:03         ` William Hubbs
2013-01-14  6:04           ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2013-01-14 14:39             ` Peter Stuge
2013-01-14 18:35               ` Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-15  9:29                 ` Debian patching KDE to use /etc for configuration (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: call for testers: udev predictable network interface names) Samuli Suominen
2013-01-15 10:25                   ` Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-15 11:00                     ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-15 16:19                       ` Alec Warner
2013-01-15 19:43                         ` Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-15 20:19                           ` Maxim Kammerer
2013-01-15 21:26                             ` Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-16  6:33                           ` Alec Warner
2013-01-16 20:34                             ` Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-17  5:36                               ` Alec Warner
2013-01-17 15:02                                 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Debian patching KDE to use /etc for configuration Ian Stakenvicius
2013-01-17 15:21                                   ` Maxim Kammerer
2013-01-17 18:01                                 ` Debian patching KDE to use /etc for configuration (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: call for testers: udev predictable network interface names) Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-14 19:06             ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: call for testers: udev predictable network interface names William Hubbs
2013-01-15  0:25               ` Peter Stuge
2013-01-15  2:48                 ` William Hubbs
2013-01-15 13:35                   ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-01-13 22:24         ` [gentoo-dev] " Kevin Chadwick
2013-01-14  6:17           ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2013-01-10  4:21 ` [gentoo-dev] " Daniel Campbell
2013-01-10  4:33   ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-10  4:36     ` Daniel Campbell
2013-01-10  6:15     ` William Hubbs [this message]
2013-01-10  9:22   ` [gentoo-dev] " Nuno J. Silva
2013-01-10 14:01   ` [gentoo-dev] " Ian Stakenvicius
2013-01-15  8:42 ` Michael Weber
2013-01-15 14:03   ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-01-15  9:16 ` Michael Weber
2013-01-15 13:58   ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-01-15 18:58     ` Greg KH
2013-01-15 23:08       ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-16  3:42         ` Peter Stuge
2013-01-16 11:36           ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-17  2:49             ` Greg KH
2013-01-17  2:55               ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-17 14:51                 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-01-21 13:50                   ` Rich Freeman
2013-01-17  8:48               ` Samuli Suominen
2013-01-16 15:19       ` Tobias Klausmann
2013-01-16 16:25         ` Mike Gilbert
2013-01-16 16:37           ` vivo75
2013-01-16 16:38           ` Michael Weber
2013-01-17 16:48         ` Peter Stuge
2013-01-17 18:44           ` Tobias Klausmann
2013-01-17 22:25             ` William Hubbs
2013-01-18 12:24 ` vivo75
2013-01-18 13:33   ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-01-18 14:54     ` William Hubbs
2013-01-18 15:07       ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-01-19 18:20         ` William Hubbs
2013-01-19 23:13           ` Francesco Riosa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130110061512.GA13417@linux1 \
    --to=williamh@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox