From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38811381F3 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 215AA21C171; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:29:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82F4C21C167 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EA4206FD for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:28:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:28:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=8qYI+2zL4bfWALE3h+3Vp3DdUiQ=; b=rXYpcXCHIG90n1yA/SApKcHM2qvX xjNswKhjke3+YHfzRHpCrhYjTw446x2NjCEG/3jKg9Phurd8o5uY0gXFqp6uhtWA blwWHUDdZNfWL0bctRPw0sUbLsuAZjpdZp3NR5Lf7s0M1evVxbPg82afvF/OrHpo 3kcRma23dYfEQFc= X-Sasl-enc: eUzJrp9Hk2z8qY7GBsxR7R8q+uk0y3J+j0hJIGg1Y3fK 1355509704 Received: from localhost (unknown [67.168.183.230]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6F7864827CD; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 13:28:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 10:28:23 -0800 From: Greg KH To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Summary Council meeting: Tuesday 11 December 2012 Message-ID: <20121214182823.GA15581@kroah.com> References: <20121204181128.GT9976@gentoo.org> <20121214104341.GK8220@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121214104341.GK8220@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: bcf2218b-32da-4539-9338-2b11093a9064 X-Archives-Hash: 81bb8fcc6709b550873150c2c6e21c82 On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:43:41AM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: > Handling separate /usr support > ============================== > After the discussion on [1] during the previous meeting, a delay of one > month due to a new fork of udev was requested. We need an update on > what's happened. > > Chainsaw reported udev and eudev have moved on, and for both it is now > possible to have a separate /usr. The follow-up discussion related to > the /usr-merge is necessary. udev was never the problem of having a separate /usr without an initrd. Have all of the other packages been properly fixed to resolve this issue correctly? Also, what's the plan for eudev going forward? thanks, greg k-h