public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes
@ 2012-12-07 15:24 William Hubbs
  2012-12-07 16:41 ` William Hubbs
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Hubbs @ 2012-12-07 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo development; +Cc: gentoo users, qa

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 766 bytes --]

I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable.

The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the
way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new
openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken.

There hadn't been bugs reported, so we started attempting to stabilize
0.11.5 so that we could have a stable newer OpenRC for releng.

When we started stabling, more regressions came up, so we had to  fix
those. That is why you are seeing several versions go to stable
directly on some arch's arch's.

wrt 0.11.7, a couple of developers looked over the patches with me and
we did not see issues. 0.11.8 will be the very last one of these to go
stable. Please bear with me on this.

Thanks,

William


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes
  2012-12-07 15:24 [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes William Hubbs
@ 2012-12-07 16:41 ` William Hubbs
       [not found]   ` <201212071658.21431.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Hubbs @ 2012-12-07 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo development; +Cc: gentoo users, qa

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1165 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable.
> 
> The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the
> way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new
> openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken.
> 
> There hadn't been bugs reported, so we started attempting to stabilize
> 0.11.5 so that we could have a stable newer OpenRC for releng.
> 
> When we started stabling, more regressions came up, so we had to  fix
> those. That is why you are seeing several versions go to stable
> directly on some arch's arch's.
> 
> wrt 0.11.7, a couple of developers looked over the patches with me and
> we did not see issues. 0.11.8 will be the very last one of these to go
> stable. Please bear with me on this.

Ok, this is the last update. 0.11.8 fixes the issue in 0.11.7, so you
should not see any more quick pushes to stable. I take full
responsibility for the issue in 0.11.7, and will work with the OpenRC
team and QA to catch issues like this better in the future. Thanks for
your patience.

William


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes
       [not found]   ` <201212071658.21431.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
@ 2012-12-07 22:06     ` William Hubbs
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Hubbs @ 2012-12-07 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user; +Cc: gentoo development, qa

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1773 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 04:58:00PM +0000, Mick wrote:
> On Friday 07 Dec 2012 16:41:27 William Hubbs wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
> > > I want to explain about the recent openrc's going directly to stable.
> > > 
> > > The team had been testing from the previous stable, 0.9.x series all the
> > > way through 0.10.x. We found out recently that releng needed the new
> > > openrc stable because of the cds/isos being broken.
> > > 
> > > There hadn't been bugs reported, so we started attempting to stabilize
> > > 0.11.5 so that we could have a stable newer OpenRC for releng.
> > > 
> > > When we started stabling, more regressions came up, so we had to  fix
> > > those. That is why you are seeing several versions go to stable
> > > directly on some arch's arch's.
> > > 
> > > wrt 0.11.7, a couple of developers looked over the patches with me and
> > > we did not see issues. 0.11.8 will be the very last one of these to go
> > > stable. Please bear with me on this.
> > 
> > Ok, this is the last update. 0.11.8 fixes the issue in 0.11.7, so you
> > should not see any more quick pushes to stable. I take full
> > responsibility for the issue in 0.11.7, and will work with the OpenRC
> > team and QA to catch issues like this better in the future. Thanks for
> > your patience.
> > 
> > William
> 
> Still with 0.11.7 until 0.11.8 reaches the mirrors and noticed a long list of, 
> e.g.:
> 
> rm: cannot remove '/lib/rc/init.d/softscripts/consolefont': Read-only file 
> system
> 
> with the init.d services.  These messages show up straight after:
> 
> * /run/lock: creating directory
> * /run/lock: correcting owner

Yes, these should be gone with 0.11.8.

Thanks,

William


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-07 22:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-07 15:24 [gentoo-dev] OpenRC stable pushes William Hubbs
2012-12-07 16:41 ` William Hubbs
     [not found]   ` <201212071658.21431.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
2012-12-07 22:06     ` [gentoo-user] " William Hubbs

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox