From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-55933-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5339138202
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:38:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97A7021C0B7;
	Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:37:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from amun.cheops.bitzolder.nl (amun.cheops.bitzolder.nl [83.161.135.166])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274E1E064E
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 15:32:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nut.cheops.bitzolder.nl ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org)
	by amun.cheops.bitzolder.nl with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.80.1)
	(envelope-from <grobian@gentoo.org>)
	id 1Ta6qu-0005Ly-Aw
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:32:09 +0100
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:32:07 +0100
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting
 summary for 3 April 2012]
Message-ID: <20121118153207.GD83592@gentoo.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <jo9t9m$aql$1@dough.gmane.org>
 <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com>
 <CAN3AtvrbJ0d6itGchoAMW4VfEVBvGWH=W8heULjJrLzCeF-g2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <4bdd949a377d40eb85590870be440551@HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu>
 <50A8943E.7070607@gentoo.org>
 <20121118080845.GA8628@kroah.com>
 <50A89A73.3050709@flameeyes.eu>
 <50A8C257.7060103@mva.name>
 <50A8F918.2010802@flameeyes.eu>
 <50A8FBC2.200@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H/DU/KGSZaQxued3"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <50A8FBC2.200@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.4.2, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3)
Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.bitzolder.nl (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV
X-Archives-Salt: 4e3ef1d8-e0e3-4826-b9e6-15433a594f12
X-Archives-Hash: 98c8903bba4f1d6d003c13bf46692d1c


--H/DU/KGSZaQxued3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 18-11-2012 17:16:18 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> Nobody has ever provided a valid reason for using sep. /usr in the ML=20
> either.

No need for a reason.

It is a fact that it is in use *right now*.

(Existing systems/installs that are not to be phased out anywhere near
soon.)

Fabian

--=20
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

--H/DU/KGSZaQxued3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAlCo/3cACgkQX3X2B8XHTokvbQCfQ/2Vkf/HykWcTPcvyeswUqAY
YC8An0gewKNzePkQboNYCFguJEi7u9qs
=GgIO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--H/DU/KGSZaQxued3--