From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6423E1381F3 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB48B21C088; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2221421C07E for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36B62019D; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (c-67-168-183-230.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.168.183.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E9FD20198; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:27:18 -0800 From: Greg KH To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Richard Yao Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] Message-ID: <20121118082718.GA24801@kroah.com> References: <20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com> <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com> <4bdd949a377d40eb85590870be440551@HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu> <50A8943E.7070607@gentoo.org> <20121118080845.GA8628@kroah.com> <50A897E0.4080404@gentoo.org> <20121118081921.GB24540@kroah.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121118081921.GB24540@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Archives-Salt: c2ed6281-3145-438e-9509-1bf209d7df26 X-Archives-Hash: 513984c53d64843651956eaccdddffb7 On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:19:21AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:10:08AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > > You are the one claiming that this is our official fork. None of us are. > > It's on the Gentoo github site, and it has the Gentoo Foundation > copyright all over all of the files in one of the branches, reviewed by > you. > > I think I would be pretty foolish if I somehow thought it was _not_ an > official fork :) Oh, and the README file says it is a Gentoo project: This is a Gentoo sponsored project and testing is currently being done with openrc. However, we aim to be distro neutral and welcome contribution from others using a variety of system initializations. We also aim towards POSIX compliance. So why would I think otherwise? thanks, greg k-h