From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A613C1381F3 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B10E221C07B; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F8621C072 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:18:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8DA2018D; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (c-67-168-183-230.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.168.183.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 468EC2018A; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:19:21 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Richard Yao Cc: "gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org" Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] Message-ID: <20121118081921.GB24540@kroah.com> References: <20120423012540.GA2130@waltdnes.org> <20120505010529.GD22763@kroah.com> <20120509183203.GA27545@kroah.com> <4bdd949a377d40eb85590870be440551@HUBCAS1.cs.stonybrook.edu> <50A8943E.7070607@gentoo.org> <20121118080845.GA8628@kroah.com> <50A897E0.4080404@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50A897E0.4080404@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Archives-Salt: 2eb6663e-a775-4aa8-b85d-352eabf99052 X-Archives-Hash: 1a6dcc91035d636be9befc099571b99b On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:10:08AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > You are the one claiming that this is our official fork. None of us are. It's on the Gentoo github site, and it has the Gentoo Foundation copyright all over all of the files in one of the branches, reviewed by you. I think I would be pretty foolish if I somehow thought it was _not_ an official fork :) > This will be an official Gentoo project when we make the announcement in > the next few days. That makes it one project of many. GLEP 0039 clearly > states how this works. If you are unhappy with GLEP 0039, then you > should discuss that with the council. I fail to see how 0039 has to do with this, please explain. I also don't see the copyright issue here, nor do I see where the decision of the council was made. Again, that's my original question, "What is the decision of the council regarding this issue"? thanks, greg k-h