From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E92F1381F3 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D46521C043; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:07:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B859521C02B for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79267201B3; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (c-67-168-183-230.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [67.168.183.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABE11201B1; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 05:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:08:04 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Richard Yao Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, klondike@gentoo.org, "Robin H. Johnson" , ulm@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012) Message-ID: <20121118050804.GA3686@kroah.com> References: <20121106212816.GE82762@gentoo.org> <20121117190207.GY83592@gentoo.org> <20121118032922.GA2335@kroah.com> <20121118033930.GA2503@kroah.com> <50A85ECE.9020601@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50A85ECE.9020601@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Archives-Salt: 4be41dbc-318d-42f5-a49f-bc487062affe X-Archives-Hash: 7aaf03ad84dea05e4848f92118a3206f On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:06:38PM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > On 11/17/2012 10:39 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > Anyway, I now see a _very_ dangerous commit in the "Copyright" branch > > that better not get merged into the tree, as it's wrong, and illegal > > under all countries that follow the "normal" body of Copyright Law. It > > should be removed right now before someone gets into trouble, not the > > least of which would be the orginization that the copyright is now being > > attributed to. > > > > Come on people, this is basic copyright law, it's not something > > radically new. It's something that _all_ software developers should > > know, either from school, or any company they have ever worked at. > > > > Please fix this now. > > klondike discussed the copyright branch changes with robbat2 before they > started and there was no problem at the time. We have retained all > copyright notices and looking at the branch, I find nothing objectionable. Why is this getting a Gentoo Foundation copyright in the first place? Why is that necessary? greg k-h