From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE819138010 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DAA721C003; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amun.cheops.ods.org (amun.cheops.ods.org [83.161.135.166]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A12021C03E for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nut.cheops.ods.org ([2001:888:1022:0:ca2a:14ff:fe35:7a00] helo=gentoo.org) by amun.cheops.ods.org with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1TTT44-0006ze-VW for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:50:19 +0100 Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:50:15 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-x86/eclass: udev.eclass Message-ID: <20121031075015.GG809@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20121030190839.A9A3D21600@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20121030191725.GC809@gentoo.org> <20121030211657.GE809@gentoo.org> <509044F9.5080901@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gNHJk6zc+1Hn+Z/L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <509044F9.5080901@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 11.4.2, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Content-Scanned: by amun.cheops.ods.org (Exim Exiscan) using SpamAssassin and ClamAV X-Archives-Salt: 863ebf58-2f24-4c45-9665-1d765fdada8c X-Archives-Hash: 7a8fdc8664c26c7e23361e3c6de11362 --gNHJk6zc+1Hn+Z/L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 30-10-2012 23:22:01 +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > So exactly what is (your) problem with the current eclass now? Your eclass pretends to support Prefix, but it is broken in that respect, and because some other eclass does it the same way (your claim), you refuse to fix it. --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --gNHJk6zc+1Hn+Z/L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlCQ2DcACgkQX3X2B8XHTokS8QCfcuURn2hxtKZxfnttKrT/gK58 j5cAmwYKxZQq+jN1wthfIukGLnxBAtar =JBB0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gNHJk6zc+1Hn+Z/L--