From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B5A138010 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 55F30E0025; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FB98E01DC for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23219 invoked by uid 501); 18 Oct 2012 00:37:14 -0000 Message-ID: <20121018003714.23218.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 02:37:14 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: removing "server" profile variants from profiles.desc Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <201210150022.51254.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: c8fbe457-0f83-4eb3-97bb-8e13686f83c4 X-Archives-Hash: 279db0a664e813a7eb437ab4a0b687c4 Ben Kohler wrote: > In my ideal world ("if I were king"), today I would delist them > from profiles.desc, and send out a news item warning of their > immediate deprecation and planned removal 3 months from now. I'm strongly in favor of this, but of course I am no developer. //Peter