From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-55369-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5708138010
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:41:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FE5421C011;
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:41:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF8BE0158
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 16:41:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u54so2713403wey.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
:mime-version:content-type;
bh=ivLvbiUkEcQ3prCVFQBqkrGACEdugg0j4vMUc5DVlO0=;
b=N2BWAQ8EtwSpeZqb9UfGfG3rx8sXKYZZgm/KSFC3d4HtqD44fS2Ep1sPaDMlVQ65Fy
kV8AhN6AXOdMh1nF4z1kXt8y7oNzu/KVmBAJeg5NkA9EW1SsdMfmXGXjOxEsImbkNNt9
jSZdslvhZ1eCQuhRxqsafaaPjlSsh1K0MpbSN5n+fhzduE65tAHxRdNg2BZftWMqQVvG
Zf9NUXZLeefkU23vlT7JouDw+g7f2tzErgZrl8rXckQ9gNHAt0U3FPbgPN0d+zI97V7i
+5JgF8bO+Khgl5CA+G/oN9u8u4MaKMV2S6BzWK5eAaxwtddhujrSQ6ho9uoI8iFTPPZW
Nv6g==
Received: by 10.180.102.131 with SMTP id fo3mr18202359wib.1.1350232868729;
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gm7sm10725165wib.10.2012.10.14.09.41.07
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sun, 14 Oct 2012 09:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:38:06 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-pms] GLEP: gentoo sync based
unified deps proposal
Message-ID: <20121014173806.6b4b4263@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121014164513.GA2873@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
References: <20120916160528.GD23030@localhost>
<20120916175921.4f01661a@googlemail.com>
<20120925224614.GF26094@localhost>
<20120929170509.63efef70@googlemail.com>
<20120930201453.GC2180@localhost>
<20120930213018.22fe16f3@googlemail.com>
<20120930214214.GE2180@localhost>
<20120930225340.126b1027@googlemail.com>
<506B2985.2040108@gentoo.org>
<20121002185614.63783db0@googlemail.com>
<20121014164513.GA2873@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
boundary="Sig_/3HVA6JtI7jf+nrtjxBS8TWj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: 82a81d14-5f68-4773-bfbb-7e3b0426e445
X-Archives-Hash: cdf3d1aeedefef9d98ecc71e130bc0ba
--Sig_/3HVA6JtI7jf+nrtjxBS8TWj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:45:13 +0100
"Steven J. Long" <slong@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:56:14PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > A :=3D only makes sense for a dependency that is present both at build
> > time and at runtime. Currently, the only place you should be seeing
> > a :=3D is on a spec that is listed in both DEPEND and RDEPEND.
> >=20
> > Conceptually, the :=3D applies to "the spec that is in both DEPEND and
> > RDEPEND". But with the current syntax, there's no such thing as "the
> > spec that is in both". There are two specs, which happen to be
> > identical as strings, one in DEPEND and one in RDEPEND, and there's
> > no way for the two to be associated.
> >=20
> Now that *is* dishonestly ignorant: you know full well that LDEPEND
> [1] covers exactly that case.
Everyone else knows full well that LDEPEND is such a badly broken idea
that it's not worth discussing...
--=20
Ciaran McCreesh
--Sig_/3HVA6JtI7jf+nrtjxBS8TWj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlB66nMACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEYNgCgzhKxZeFomnIoYwxIM2x8beip
RM4AoN6qD24qqY4rG6gxwYvYhoF1qT6D
=reUG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/3HVA6JtI7jf+nrtjxBS8TWj--