From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199C3138010 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 769A2E0710; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23962E052E for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-254-69-147.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.69.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F2AD33CAAD; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:22:56 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Message-ID: <20120918222256.548078ba@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120918211110.72d9c0b2@googlemail.com> References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> <20120918102551.500ff19b@pomiocik.lan> <20120918092426.GA5384@localhost> <20568.16682.31115.233591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120918110637.GF5384@localhost> <20568.25833.33593.344770@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120918220606.45bde58c@pomiocik.lan> <20120918211110.72d9c0b2@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/dMYaWpTJHfTU.BRDVl4rAEB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 78eaaf21-216d-48fd-b0c0-7e2a5565004c X-Archives-Hash: e229a7f024f9229db4fe259829b4cd9c --Sig_/dMYaWpTJHfTU.BRDVl4rAEB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:11:10 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:06:06 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > So far, I'm not sure if there was a single, complete, exact problem > > discussed which is solved by this syntax other than cosmetics. >=20 > Perhaps you should read the GLEP then. Thanks for your comprehensive answer. Could you point me, please, where is there a real, current, exact problem described? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/dMYaWpTJHfTU.BRDVl4rAEB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlBY2CAACgkQfXuS5UK5QB0AnAP/QEV1thcEzokksMPVvuz/FU5O mTxYsc8OHCOapikqYKfDRi/c+libTfc/nyOjqgFpB+wWNejK63Wb2l20IQxl+InV V+W3SJMwkI9J16oXoPlrSBsk4IVxNue3uNbR7nvBw0wRfQMOJGG2ZLNIaOMFNdag jznstieh0wROoRYeAvc= =4i0K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dMYaWpTJHfTU.BRDVl4rAEB--