From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C726138010 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B978D21C037; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A13621C07F for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so3470619wib.10 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=KT2aBScQkcnrgNcnTtEvXevJBpRi++6Ahr9m7SkJrBQ=; b=qVFlTDd9wPswX+b1Bd+RA4PU7s/AfZsOUs8hxTCnGiJQ8mv4W+5QhqoZouvXIyMt6L S7WTcj2ESU7paM8GmIRbpmIZAcFK0Ie6GvsjR0x2MVwAcy9QD6Kcwc1LhnOVlr5lUGSk QILcGir2i08g/6dIdxRtdYdoy0qlVFGNSBSbuilJ3u36XnKsh8qu4NnjCSU7fZeJMUJZ GhLiLakAZpyQkOREvN+T5z5/XoHY6gxfwCE+MRv5cKiCBUxtP4DPsdwLDSqGiyocL4L+ sgpUGcNxgOVTtjW3jW8e7MBp0ztedsA38zrUaQ4A26ULjNKztj0lQ81EqOjkXMfeBpIP MoXQ== Received: by 10.216.241.198 with SMTP id g48mr523735wer.153.1348002663627; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id do5sm1252987wib.10.2012.09.18.14.11.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:08:43 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Message-ID: <20120918220843.39868fd0@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120918230606.03d994f2@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> <20120918102551.500ff19b@pomiocik.lan> <20120918092426.GA5384@localhost> <20568.16682.31115.233591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <50584559.2000909@gmail.com> <20568.20091.816189.902403@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <5058CAC5.5080706@gentoo.org> <20120918202909.7b238573@googlemail.com> <5058CE43.6000501@gentoo.org> <20120918204433.52af8bcd@googlemail.com> <20120918225104.567ca679@pomiocik.lan> <20120918215355.7ee46043@googlemail.com> <20120918230606.03d994f2@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/UHUfjqIldEFRrUhRsaX6y75"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: dad5df6c-f6de-486f-8bac-ceae91e28065 X-Archives-Hash: 5fb205bf5b5f71aee54662ba4957b6c5 --Sig_/UHUfjqIldEFRrUhRsaX6y75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:06:06 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > But didn't we already point out that we can't have them in RDEPEND > since they introduce conflicts? You are missing a basic and important part of how dependency resolution works: currently, cycles consisting purely of RDEPENDs are ignorable. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/UHUfjqIldEFRrUhRsaX6y75 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBY4uAACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFMRQCgo5b8NkQzUlKcJHpENVc0GOec EOUAoLsgGfTtEQoyegQTd31eK0Of4KVz =hBDS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/UHUfjqIldEFRrUhRsaX6y75--