From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75D4138010 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:35:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBA6421C02B; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD7521C036 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so247113wib.10 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:29:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=k9CY/m9szubeAbB8jXEz7OlOeqe88c4j7bt4orvDwb4=; b=Avw6ep/eDA6Z9LbWPQwAPY7X9yyTfLkuG+pKWKDnAo8uPy/IKBANPwuKh4oP/v2nDK Ola6YddWpgf0TeOSpj88xsCRahA///AJjVHikMzxP+hAFc1BEsbh3jZ6HeIaLtyuX5xf s7qWKye+ADmfc+1+oaUNQYveojeN+qS3l7KiRMXgGSdzldUN2qvzcaMYDyAeIwJ0hstc Y0TVhHxjJ2ND0rmgTRY5ssqvj09D2nJQ48lbSmKd9Vh9C/2hAb+C1L1BxVjVZcaGHlGb QBLIgizZCnfnsomyiTkjFMUeXxiVGxDIA9m+JQX2IpVsFpwoOWhWA1md+tdIxbIqC3kn 8RaQ== Received: by 10.180.104.200 with SMTP id gg8mr1755494wib.14.1348000176230; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:29:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j6sm1091761wiy.4.2012.09.18.13.29.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:27:17 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Message-ID: <20120918212717.39e802f2@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120918222256.548078ba@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> <20120918102551.500ff19b@pomiocik.lan> <20120918092426.GA5384@localhost> <20568.16682.31115.233591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120918110637.GF5384@localhost> <20568.25833.33593.344770@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120918220606.45bde58c@pomiocik.lan> <20120918211110.72d9c0b2@googlemail.com> <20120918222256.548078ba@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/+7u6EI75h3OD6hlRUk3Su2b"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3383689e-9d26-41d5-aa8b-8ea4a6dc549f X-Archives-Hash: 41433214f2c4086a5d4199f98e3b0c01 --Sig_/+7u6EI75h3OD6hlRUk3Su2b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:22:56 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:11:10 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:06:06 +0200 > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > So far, I'm not sure if there was a single, complete, exact > > > problem discussed which is solved by this syntax other than > > > cosmetics. > >=20 > > Perhaps you should read the GLEP then. >=20 > Thanks for your comprehensive answer. Could you point me, please, > where is there a real, current, exact problem described? "Motivation / Rationale" --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/+7u6EI75h3OD6hlRUk3Su2b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBY2SgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGuRQCgkVay+tDKc/bHIATe2n7IveVs IhgAn0eV/c6XWC2S1x0vhwW8k1GJNkef =UDG0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/+7u6EI75h3OD6hlRUk3Su2b--