From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54825-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C541138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:15:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB07DE06FD;
	Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:14:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B756E06CC
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:13:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by weyu54 with SMTP id u54so146787wey.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer
         :mime-version:content-type;
        bh=FcJnlYVeXKts65mBWN7GvLKscOwAJ7lu3otc2yv5BP4=;
        b=fbGuwQYc4Y9a+EW+giVZJQuqVgeR96LvA8JkavWA4BvUDgXv5cDOY9f+mGM50+KKGs
         L6ciZnlYSKpNwBxAt4SJpB8jBedPgcZI8SrPq5d4qMHmPZpqk0+45i3EXEsfw2MtZ2ZK
         8An58ER2f0J86YFJ3oqB1NsnPQteeahtJAFh1Cit2gZTWwwTxPBBX3XINcwuEG2Zp9Hn
         VJWroJEgiWZiNp5gFx2SBYkYWvwMUvKqia5MfifOiW3FILjUaeSwc5Zx8m+OF6CCA5Ps
         44i2TPVYOg8VwXh0D2bf8uxwV9bVFJMSLG5fz+LcZl6e708NvV1Sh4YI1irEdj9qoi9/
         C9YQ==
Received: by 10.180.96.3 with SMTP id do3mr1739514wib.5.1347999208722;
        Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9sm24229093wiz.1.2012.09.18.13.13.26
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:11:10 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal
Message-ID: <20120918211110.72d9c0b2@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120918220606.45bde58c@pomiocik.lan>
References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost>
	<20120918102551.500ff19b@pomiocik.lan>
	<20120918092426.GA5384@localhost>
	<20568.16682.31115.233591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	<20120918110637.GF5384@localhost>
	<20568.25833.33593.344770@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	<CAAr7Pr8ZWeLwECYrf0MXvUTERTvf_TiXHE7RtLsUK+7WJ6K+aQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120918220606.45bde58c@pomiocik.lan>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1;
 boundary="Sig_/S+Fn3gooJmJUVEE=oyDTdah"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Archives-Salt: a1e71061-4d4c-468e-a3e3-aab20ed1213a
X-Archives-Hash: f61fadf040e08edcf74879f65baec77a

--Sig_/S+Fn3gooJmJUVEE=oyDTdah
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:06:06 +0200
Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> So far, I'm not sure if there was a single, complete, exact problem
> discussed which is solved by this syntax other than cosmetics.

Perhaps you should read the GLEP then.

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh

--Sig_/S+Fn3gooJmJUVEE=oyDTdah
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlBY1WEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGLPwCgxVMpNoUHU7JbwM4r3TnDPCKa
rmsAnjJ/8x5LyVkfBW6YgrpEWei8kKIY
=h51U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/S+Fn3gooJmJUVEE=oyDTdah--