From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C541138010 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB07DE06FD; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B756E06CC for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyu54 with SMTP id u54so146787wey.40 for ; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:13:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=FcJnlYVeXKts65mBWN7GvLKscOwAJ7lu3otc2yv5BP4=; b=fbGuwQYc4Y9a+EW+giVZJQuqVgeR96LvA8JkavWA4BvUDgXv5cDOY9f+mGM50+KKGs L6ciZnlYSKpNwBxAt4SJpB8jBedPgcZI8SrPq5d4qMHmPZpqk0+45i3EXEsfw2MtZ2ZK 8An58ER2f0J86YFJ3oqB1NsnPQteeahtJAFh1Cit2gZTWwwTxPBBX3XINcwuEG2Zp9Hn VJWroJEgiWZiNp5gFx2SBYkYWvwMUvKqia5MfifOiW3FILjUaeSwc5Zx8m+OF6CCA5Ps 44i2TPVYOg8VwXh0D2bf8uxwV9bVFJMSLG5fz+LcZl6e708NvV1Sh4YI1irEdj9qoi9/ C9YQ== Received: by 10.180.96.3 with SMTP id do3mr1739514wib.5.1347999208722; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:13:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h9sm24229093wiz.1.2012.09.18.13.13.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:11:10 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Message-ID: <20120918211110.72d9c0b2@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120918220606.45bde58c@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> <20120918102551.500ff19b@pomiocik.lan> <20120918092426.GA5384@localhost> <20568.16682.31115.233591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120918110637.GF5384@localhost> <20568.25833.33593.344770@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20120918220606.45bde58c@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/S+Fn3gooJmJUVEE=oyDTdah"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a1e71061-4d4c-468e-a3e3-aab20ed1213a X-Archives-Hash: f61fadf040e08edcf74879f65baec77a --Sig_/S+Fn3gooJmJUVEE=oyDTdah Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:06:06 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > So far, I'm not sure if there was a single, complete, exact problem > discussed which is solved by this syntax other than cosmetics. Perhaps you should read the GLEP then. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/S+Fn3gooJmJUVEE=oyDTdah Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBY1WEACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGLPwCgxVMpNoUHU7JbwM4r3TnDPCKa rmsAnjJ/8x5LyVkfBW6YgrpEWei8kKIY =h51U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/S+Fn3gooJmJUVEE=oyDTdah--