From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6E7138010 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C28CE027D; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F8E21C002 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyu54 with SMTP id u54so541064wey.40 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:17:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=/q8R5o6LRgvUxRrfPkTNtuqZONfwHp3mI/VLbusImpw=; b=bMjsg5j5VqTgqeylDfMbWZKz/6P28hmY/uXDiV/ZzqvZSQJfE3QozZg9V/m+JEG/0u U1XgWqbxSFBeD1abgWVN/ujZls0WeTa3FKONF9dlJBEzigOHhRINqGGaXbIacHxrziAP TXKPMBv5fHI3Db6+UO1jF3JmpcfapX5wNqZMj0zwE6hVVJhOvBINUDkdz6Iaw5nGr3GU 3QJEgH1u23RPEdwRQD+Jctzht9xtDs2cH6YvyOAH8t2idHxsDGvFZf87mjBTOXuH6fEQ k+g1VKsWUYk0ImRIubYe7tmuUoudlXT5sB//B7wzBS5CXmabXtOK+tpSvj/42HnvLoE7 oOFA== Received: by 10.216.136.158 with SMTP id w30mr6084988wei.136.1347891414888; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7sm26249639wiz.9.2012.09.17.07.16.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Sep 2012 07:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:14:33 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Message-ID: <20120917151433.1f32179a@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20120916135211.GC23030@localhost> <20120917030821.GA15027@localhost> <20120917134149.0bc8ab72@googlemail.com> <20120917145853.33db671d@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/tC.ZMl74AaL+_PHVcM2tgVp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: dcf0d5ba-a6f6-449d-ac11-824c5e30cad4 X-Archives-Hash: 705acd61bc053d12efaba0500048f1c7 --Sig_/tC.ZMl74AaL+_PHVcM2tgVp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:11:59 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote: > > And even now, people are using COMMON_DEPEND to work around *DEPEND > > duplication. >=20 > Yes, and that works just fine. I don't see what's wrong with that... Well perhaps you should read Brian's lengthy explanation that started this thread, then. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/tC.ZMl74AaL+_PHVcM2tgVp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBXMEwACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHGXQCfYc93M584yO5sExaIrfU9HhnX HFwAn02MHXqd1sz0GpIMJtCC7amJaQrt =P8Ck -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tC.ZMl74AaL+_PHVcM2tgVp--