From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1991A138010 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4D7B21C02B; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E95421C019 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (pc-234-79-101-190.cm.vtr.net [190.101.79.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D2BA33C6EF for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:57:50 -0300 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog profiles.desc Message-ID: <20120917115750.5b6d1ec0@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201209162206.19807.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20120828002311.815E120987@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201209151848.03566.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120916120100.670c0578@gentoo.org> <201209162206.19807.vapier@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2c0ab450-c89c-497a-9054-28aebe134684 X-Archives-Hash: 1877b7feea2440e123b78901de354241 On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:06:19 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 16 September 2012 11:01:00 Alexis Ballier wrote: > > also, you are missing some bug # for the 'broken deps' part. > > packages that have gained broken deps when the profile was marked > > 'dev', or that you committed with your profile.desc locally > > modified, do not count and are your fault actually... > > wrong. if i'm version bumping a package and i see broken amd64-fbsd > deps, that is not my problem. sounds like i'll simply de-keyword it > in the future and let someone else pick up the pieces. > > do a repoman on the tree. there are multiple packages coming back > right now with broken amd64-fbsd deps. now that the repoman run has finished, lets analyze it: dev-vcs/git/git-1.7.12-r2.ebuild: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0) ['app-text/highlight'] x11-base/xorg-drivers/xorg-drivers-1.13.ebuild: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0) ['x11-drivers/xf86-video-chips', 'x11-drivers/xf86-video-rendition', 'x11-drivers/xf86-video-tseng'] both added and unnoticed when the profile was marked as dev net-misc/wget/wget-1.14.ebuild: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0) ['sys-apps/util-linux'] bumped by you, earlier, probably when you made your local change. util-_linux_ not being keyworded on fbsd is not what I would call a broken dep. uuid functions are provided by either e2fsprogs-libs or the libc on freebsd. maybe it would be a good idea to drop keywords and ask for rekeywording to the arch team in that case ?