Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog profiles.desc

[Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>]

On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:06:19 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Sunday 16 September 2012 11:01:00 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > also, you are missing some bug # for the 'broken deps' part.
> > packages that have gained broken deps when the profile was marked
> > 'dev', or that you committed with your profile.desc locally
> > modified, do not count and are your fault actually...
> 
> wrong.  if i'm version bumping a package and i see broken amd64-fbsd
> deps, that is not my problem.  sounds like i'll simply de-keyword it
> in the future and let someone else pick up the pieces.
> 
> do a repoman on the tree.  there are multiple packages coming back
> right now with broken amd64-fbsd deps.

now that the repoman run has finished, lets analyze it:

dev-vcs/git/git-1.7.12-r2.ebuild:
~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0) ['app-text/highlight']
x11-base/xorg-drivers/xorg-drivers-1.13.ebuild:
~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0)
['x11-drivers/xf86-video-chips', 'x11-drivers/xf86-video-rendition',
'x11-drivers/xf86-video-tseng']

both added and unnoticed when the profile was marked as dev

net-misc/wget/wget-1.14.ebuild: ~amd64-fbsd(default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0)
['sys-apps/util-linux']

bumped by you, earlier, probably when you made your local change.
util-_linux_ not being keyworded on fbsd is not what I would call a
broken dep. uuid functions are provided by either e2fsprogs-libs or the
libc on freebsd. maybe it would be a good idea to drop keywords and ask
for rekeywording to the arch team in that case ?