From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F18138010 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 02:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8794E0746; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 02:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F290E076B for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 02:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5775D33C844 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 02:06:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog profiles.desc Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:06:19 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20120828002311.815E120987@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201209151848.03566.vapier@gentoo.org> <20120916120100.670c0578@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20120916120100.670c0578@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6538271.sVybEaWQ8a"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201209162206.19807.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 25fa8a67-67f7-4a2e-9833-fa9db8c617d0 X-Archives-Hash: 58cb08bb0e241304ad7cd2d7bf4264aa --nextPart6538271.sVybEaWQ8a Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 16 September 2012 11:01:00 Alexis Ballier wrote: > also, you are missing some bug # for the 'broken deps' part. packages > that have gained broken deps when the profile was marked 'dev', or that > you committed with your profile.desc locally modified, do not count and > are your fault actually... wrong. if i'm version bumping a package and i see broken amd64-fbsd deps,= =20 that is not my problem. sounds like i'll simply de-keyword it in the futur= e=20 and let someone else pick up the pieces. do a repoman on the tree. there are multiple packages coming back right no= w=20 with broken amd64-fbsd deps. =2Dmike --nextPart6538271.sVybEaWQ8a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQVoWbAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBfo0QALlp0uXFVRCXzW99CmlWdIIl mANyG8ElcPp4Ph5UGPesstRHhVCp3e0vpRCI/dkf95Mf3G5NuLfiOK0njjbZM/ZP lki7tQh/kygBdX5NWyo/ML7ajoh4sH7hGMZCtTPbMGYDbV4HO8+pbAP+grZj9npr Ual5qax0Qkdm5TyGxw6pOQQz+D3E7jtJirMZbz3PYy/3zCNG+nIp8DpGdHtkdFZb 3cHPV0cIHKArfYifOr2RzjWrUf1NmaHx4IX/oNMv+6cw+OIpgjrgZkxrtlefj7Bt TxdreHNVOutceK0NARakaNUtmnX+g1ZErL3McC15iAJ/EytiVa5vw58rqXklt1O4 Zmzrx8PCx6dV8XlFeV5OAwbmsOBXWNLDjbXcpXis/lQS2EZ0EpH1EErC93M9PWVI 6CHz8vTF5qnsckfm3q7Zy2Yahk5znynztrXPS/vkyZnr2jt2TOyUMhr979NZ7NNf qBMtJouT7seeGXNzAcP3YNgO6okeVUWGFwFd2hqYk9yixiZDnyK0RkGmLEuFrnjD T9YplshwWexUhQQc1Ey/ud7sPuUsXaEnvWUus5vCIFvHhjzSt+nGgIztw5U7qyw/ /7y3Fr1/5IuOVlOOWpb87a7hSNKuIMLNWR21RFBYi0L/SvUgZhyerBbJQ8ffwHz9 wUQsp93LfL5+p9w1MN0E =yQuD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6538271.sVybEaWQ8a--