On Sunday 16 September 2012 11:01:00 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> also, you are missing some bug # for the 'broken deps' part. packages
> that have gained broken deps when the profile was marked 'dev', or that
> you committed with your profile.desc locally modified, do not count and
> are your fault actually...

wrong.  if i'm version bumping a package and i see broken amd64-fbsd deps, 
that is not my problem.  sounds like i'll simply de-keyword it in the future 
and let someone else pick up the pieces.

do a repoman on the tree.  there are multiple packages coming back right now 
with broken amd64-fbsd deps.
-mike