From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54744-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CE9138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:02:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC7EF21C002;
	Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:02:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A16E063F
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:01:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (pc-234-79-101-190.cm.vtr.net [190.101.79.234])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: aballier)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9979D33D389
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:01:07 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 12:01:00 -0300
From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in
 profiles: ChangeLog profiles.desc
Message-ID: <20120916120100.670c0578@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <201209151848.03566.vapier@gentoo.org>
References: <20120828002311.815E120987@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
	<20120911150630.60ad1b83@gentoo.org>
	<201209151848.03566.vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: Gentoo
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 6b3731c6-baa5-417a-b3c8-8232d2194fe3
X-Archives-Hash: 8b7b87e2c474f3d3cf85abeb3fdda36e

On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 18:47:56 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Tuesday 11 September 2012 14:06:30 Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > vapier      12/08/28 00:23:11
> > > 
> > >   Modified:             ChangeLog profiles.desc
> > >   Log:
> > >   add new s390x profile #345421
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > > @@ -152,7 +153,7 @@
> > > 
> > >  x86             default/linux/x86/10.0/server
> > > 
> > > stable
> > > 
> > >  # Gentoo/FreeBSD Profiles
> > > 
> > > -amd64-fbsd	default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0 stable
> > > +amd64-fbsd   default/bsd/fbsd/amd64/9.0 dev
> > > sparc-fbsd	default/bsd/fbsd/sparc/8.2 exp
> > > x86-fbsd      default/bsd/fbsd/x86/8.2   dev
> > > x86-fbsd      default/bsd/fbsd/x86/9.0   dev
> > 
> > please be more careful, it is good practice to review the cvs diff
> > output before hitting ci when committing to the profiles or eclass
> > directories.
> 
> that was only partially an accident.  amd64-fbsd has no business
> being in stable since it has broken deps and has no stable keywords.

search the archives as for why its stable. profile not being stable
is the cause for broken deps, not the consequence...
also, where does your idea stable profile == stable keywords come
from ? if you want them to be the same, you need to invent something
that would make repoman checks fatals for broken deps rather than
displaying non fatal warnings that nobody ever reads because it needs
-d.

also, you are missing some bug # for the 'broken deps' part. packages
that have gained broken deps when the profile was marked 'dev', or that
you committed with your profile.desc locally modified, do not count and
are your fault actually...