From: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] a libtool + multilib gentoo host + 64->32 cross-prefix problem: a request for eyeballs
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:06:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120916110646.3467.qmail@stuge.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502A4435.1030001@malth.us>
Gregory M. Turner wrote:
> Please see https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430722, especially
> the final two posts.
I think the problem is that upstream isn't multilib-aware.
I also think that it would be awesome if Gentoo could handle such
situations for us. The brute force method would be to do things in
every ebuild for multilib-challenged packages, but something smarter
would be nice..
//Peter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-16 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 12:27 [gentoo-dev] a libtool + multilib gentoo host + 64->32 cross-prefix problem: a request for eyeballs Gregory M. Turner
2012-09-16 11:06 ` Peter Stuge [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120916110646.3467.qmail@stuge.se \
--to=peter@stuge.se \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox