From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8136138010 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 719E721C030; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECE821C011 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jer) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5249C335E2D for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:43:50 +0200 From: Jeroen Roovers To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About changing security policy to unCC maintainers when their are not needed Message-ID: <20120913034350.24e9c3dc@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> In-Reply-To: <1347476000.2365.14.camel@belkin4> References: <1347472741.2365.5.camel@belkin4> <20120912202932.1fc1adbb@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net> <1347476000.2365.14.camel@belkin4> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 050e2cb8-f2b2-4a20-bb47-03c842d57fcd X-Archives-Hash: 094e6deed47df3774e21f3b9b0c9ca0e On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:53:20 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > > You can un-CC yourself. I don't see why security@ should be doing > > the legwork. > > It shouldn't be so hard to do, they can do it just when they CC > arches, instead of relaying some random team member to do it himself > once a useless message is received It does become a chore when you have to check a list to match various CC'd people's preferences and decide whether to un-CC them based on that, the way they were CC'd (did they do it themselves, were they CC'd by security, and so on) and perhaps some other factors someone will no doubt soon propose in this thread. Basically you are saying, "why doesn't anyone else do my volunteer work for me". jer