From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54620-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511C4138010
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC16FE064A;
	Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:49:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15514E0504
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:48:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so3202721obb.40
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent;
        bh=+un7jOTP2vifYJDo7BsnF4sM0aoxeh5OKJoRRNu3IMA=;
        b=RgWF5fXJPuHY0ecebEzUlRTIahZfK5z+vbJaMk6JN/kkNqWJiXjwcWry6OFAdRvtCe
         orpq5xJfXcNK89nTCvO3opUCGJZr0C4otj9P7rgSOBXf2zNVQn+HB8TrLhGEC2F4eSCQ
         s6uHjpLfFc2CtqHPUXajF5uEBEEFDUTjC9rYBa35qKlYydeqIjQkdT/vFbLFC6spBDTx
         FvFLAQpZ2Me6OKxWtG7nyOjRIJiw17wJykfExOu44aCp/GbvfPzdeMbxcpPN0MiBuPpw
         CCtrCg2FQba1eMzYuSFwXzZzDZZabHK8VZOwqNk6fAK9+8cgjgtJARBrziVEy9fN49xt
         qItw==
Received: by 10.60.5.129 with SMTP id s1mr14350088oes.85.1347288515056;
        Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:48:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-95-12.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.95.12])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k3sm13433340obw.4.2012.09.10.07.48.33
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:48:32 -0500
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 09:48:32 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] rfc: netplugd and ifplugd support in OpenRc
Message-ID: <20120910144832.GA22292@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo development <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 007c8b3a-e3f5-4509-ad5a-d4288fd7366c
X-Archives-Hash: 9755dc1a8e83a2fb268f49eba4a38f00


--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

All,

I have a regression in OpenRc wrt netplugd [1].

In researching this program, I have found that it and ifplugd, which is
the alternative, have been unmaintained for years. Also Debian has
declared netplugd to be obsolete in favor of ifplugd.

Does anyone have any thoughts about whether we should keep OpenRC
support for one or both of these?

Thanks,

William

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=427088

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlBN/cAACgkQblQW9DDEZTgWFwCgkMzEzKx7fP9qTpZtHovJSias
1OkAoK6NRgHw9gRN4Fa48D3ORZtc0+mh
=zPHV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--