From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC86A138010 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36D4121C040; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF66E04BA for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-255-218-187.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.218.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06D3733CE37; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:21:42 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept Message-ID: <20120907212142.06627af2@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120907201319.31b31e88@googlemail.com> References: <20120907124559.68a1b88d@googlemail.com> <20120907124641.0135693d@gentoo.org> <20120907171059.525eea36@googlemail.com> <504A269A.6000006@gentoo.org> <20120907175802.5a3948a8@googlemail.com> <504A28A8.8020805@gentoo.org> <504A319E.9070803@gentoo.org> <504A35A8.704@gentoo.org> <20120907202323.2d63baa9@pomiocik.lan> <20120907193116.5385f41e@googlemail.com> <20120907204648.263814ff@pomiocik.lan> <20120907195205.6e4b14fb@googlemail.com> <20120907211122.62d78b11@pomiocik.lan> <20120907201319.31b31e88@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.12; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/CgieKkrib3.7uj=AWfMS0LG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 2b84f32a-c2fc-4074-b5a9-b355924c53f7 X-Archives-Hash: 05566655ace700824cd013274e829e30 --Sig_/CgieKkrib3.7uj=AWfMS0LG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:13:19 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:11:22 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:52:05 +0100 > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:46:48 +0200 > > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > > Now, let me remind you because you probably fail to know the > > > > world outside your dreamworld: > > > >=20 > > > > (with HDEPEND/DEPEND) generally mean that we would need to > > > > s/DEPEND/HDEPEND/ for the vast majority of ebuilds (ie all the > > > > trivial ones)? > > > >=20 > > > > That does effectively refer to the common depends as well. You > > > > know, in the real world where there is no magical variables > > > > which do miracles behind your back. > > >=20 > > > Uhm, no, it doesn't. Things in both DEPEND and RDEPEND are an > > > *entirely* different case when it comes to destinations, since > > > RDEPEND goes to ROOT. > >=20 > > And? RDEPEND isn't required to be merged before building the > > package. >=20 > I repeat: "things in both DEPEND and RDEPEND". >=20 > I also repeat: HDEPEND is relevant only to things that are in DEPEND > and not RDEPEND. So... what is your issue in here, sir? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/CgieKkrib3.7uj=AWfMS0LG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlBKSUYACgkQfXuS5UK5QB3kgAP+J1iJ20RNyBvc6TNtMknLrxI9 LXWNcOYeJKs0Cwz/d3WX6T8VBqXteZon0xH3UHI2wp0Qki8ugfuY0+9kJHklX8rq AvhiA9tGWDFjM6NgdRUik4cuFXYvQi7ioFzVPvPCBYZDGMdGDo/wUvIVV5k431vJ Fmt7Eho/7kmeKX+TNsY= =tB2b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/CgieKkrib3.7uj=AWfMS0LG--