From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A372B138010 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:19:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A96521C09D; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2B021C097 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so133804wib.10 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:17:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=+DBXVpH9+J2TvCQXMhrHlVrAwaUMC3alSMWwyIE45q8=; b=BiVZxmIkok6GN7BJwfpUvRzm8vTmG6jVBjdvw5ME9H1kgDmRyc44yO1ZxSzOrnne1I 8jHa8ybNkL/J52FLvcCFpaOCjpk9cSev3ujzPyVjhe7Q5t4M451h5deyVFuhR9ol7Mwr PaAuMwohU/pq8rIMOm4IXSz3XSQ5FD15pKXoLr7H5RuyWxUHx/H2+KuPXAM60WtlZrXa BDdtD/DfBMJ8BVxYxcG6S9cQ1Fa8iSKHxvForW/e7JEHVbk4QVph/uHKGgSfc/QDW9ub EtSPCfm3ZgiWs0fCzYMNDaBjG4opElmaPCntzKL3IzSifaIqXaOWLo6xMBorpIDRYG3d +YSg== Received: by 10.180.100.35 with SMTP id ev3mr578565wib.7.1347049023880; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fb20sm850596wid.1.2012.09.07.13.17.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 13:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:15:03 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept Message-ID: <20120907211503.70173d3c@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120907220730.0ac39bba@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120907124559.68a1b88d@googlemail.com> <20120907124641.0135693d@gentoo.org> <20120907171059.525eea36@googlemail.com> <504A269A.6000006@gentoo.org> <20120907175802.5a3948a8@googlemail.com> <504A28A8.8020805@gentoo.org> <504A319E.9070803@gentoo.org> <504A35A8.704@gentoo.org> <20120907202323.2d63baa9@pomiocik.lan> <20120907193116.5385f41e@googlemail.com> <20120907204648.263814ff@pomiocik.lan> <20120907195205.6e4b14fb@googlemail.com> <20120907211122.62d78b11@pomiocik.lan> <20120907201319.31b31e88@googlemail.com> <20120907212142.06627af2@pomiocik.lan> <20120907202558.46acfdad@googlemail.com> <20120907220730.0ac39bba@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/tUWUwuKm=n7cpIOAiEWPGOi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9259f2b3-268c-4ea5-8f5f-7277f589272a X-Archives-Hash: 7aaa0db3243cafdd94d626a6bc9c5b99 --Sig_/tUWUwuKm=n7cpIOAiEWPGOi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 22:07:30 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:25:58 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 21:21:42 +0200 > > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > So... what is your issue in here, sir? > >=20 > > The issue is what Zac, Ian and I were discussing, before you jumped > > in and started yelling. Repeating it for you: > >=20 > > We want to know, for dependencies that are in DEPEND and not > > RDEPEND, whether or not most of them will become HDEPENDs, if > > dependencies are being expressed properly. If that is the case, > > then it makes more sense to introduce TDEPEND than HDEPEND. >=20 > The only person yelling here is you. I have politely asked a question, > and then you come with your wisdom not answering it at all. And if you > haven't noticed, my question was directed to Ian who -- unlike you -- > may be able to say something meaningful in the topic rather than > diverging from it just to prove a random point only you know. Ian and I are asking essentially the same question regarding the same issue, and I believe you're the only interested person so far who has had any difficulty understanding that. However, if hearing it from someone other than me makes it easier for you to accept that there is something to discuss, then you're welcome to pretend that everything that I say from now on was written by someone other than me. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/tUWUwuKm=n7cpIOAiEWPGOi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBKVcoACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHE4wCcDMDVmyfFuwfp05XsxnUTv9xc CtMAmgP0wvF1JvFTGSYabL0tYLkCQGUI =JBED -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tUWUwuKm=n7cpIOAiEWPGOi--