From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBB2138010 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:38:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EE8B21C072; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C8121C105 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so59935wib.10 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=/A3bsKQnmaRqLFxG984KW9mIG0386v4cwEiiHTN9EcM=; b=fHJSM17AaKmkO4XG1guyg/uq4vIBkhGRMKyOjODGHIoSJRkoIznoYnE2Ber82izuFC HFrEDRcl4fTjTr3TT1bEIBQO3+FvLZpsTbz/5YnREPGena1okkVHKOtA0Z0dBDoKtZ0f 7D6Kyh8BoWZBI203+IW0h7oBV0MjyhwWvslr7fsqMgO8Aum64M+mpf8owcC0YRLJWuA4 zj1SNhVx8vEvm7AUJiG1YAr7900iqND4m++cQEWnyjZnoAEUuqskxMSEG3wFNDXOUPcI idRY6KgDE49Af3cyFkpr3fwbS9ABZinFL3S87NjxdmVBOHa0Jug2bYUb4KW5eZRTvI7T 8ioQ== Received: by 10.216.237.193 with SMTP id y43mr3833022weq.75.1347042796679; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fp3sm74491wib.7.2012.09.07.11.33.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:31:16 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept Message-ID: <20120907193116.5385f41e@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120907202323.2d63baa9@pomiocik.lan> References: <20120907124559.68a1b88d@googlemail.com> <20120907124641.0135693d@gentoo.org> <20120907171059.525eea36@googlemail.com> <504A269A.6000006@gentoo.org> <20120907175802.5a3948a8@googlemail.com> <504A28A8.8020805@gentoo.org> <504A319E.9070803@gentoo.org> <504A35A8.704@gentoo.org> <20120907202323.2d63baa9@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/xWSI2/MNgJxPu9ODnSPKWfI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 2a5c587d-d577-4319-be35-14e1d4b9c06f X-Archives-Hash: 1ad5345100f30dbfeaba6ffe33f6b8e6 --Sig_/xWSI2/MNgJxPu9ODnSPKWfI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:23:23 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > I can't agree unless I am missing something. Doesn't the majority of > ebuilds actually require most of DEPEND (well, the part common with > RDEPEND) to be installed on the target? I'm thinking of the shared > libraries mostly. "The part common with RDEPEND" is a different issue. We're talking about what the usual thing to do is for dependencies that are in DEPEND but not RDEPEND. A typical example here is a binary that is executed as part of the build process. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/xWSI2/MNgJxPu9ODnSPKWfI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBKPXcACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGHEACeMnQfIfdeG/FpFxh3c8caO+Zg Nc0AoLCvYKHmO05aHn4KDvd8h4J8TkQy =37ve -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/xWSI2/MNgJxPu9ODnSPKWfI--