From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4822F138010 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D98121C109; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D7821C0DB for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so2117044wgb.10 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:23:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=R2RxrA2DavozOVwdh+e1mPWAyXfvmWaPDsiJ2FYYCgE=; b=nZGFi8/QuxWbrT8HeVrOhDyOQpidcFRWU9G13OIjZY6T5QdsJpgJEobRg9SPYk/9Z/ gOKyvBUwUdkF1GSqRAGJIiOc3eMdY2R/sGJniw0CENFSB6qTlU/B3K9bZFZrkxkJS2p6 nLfhrR3FHOojmt5cQbdMrDh5hCQ9BLimojC0SVMPN7hjkWQ78nmty00eE+Ay2zRijTrG /IywArHkBVS2abNigVkEc3LnVZ7e5c3L4QCOcddLbnG9CxPZf7VYSE/Tud4/dXP6Pn8x ZiNdRc7gytfM3EJ1PHvzHQ9VFAxl8lVVtxpW9SD3+/EaZpQOlrTVLUwA+6NOvbu40W/I nTzw== Received: by 10.216.134.216 with SMTP id s66mr3400944wei.26.1347042236806; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l6sm46134wiz.4.2012.09.07.11.23.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:23:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:21:57 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sub-slots (for EAPI 5) Message-ID: <20120907192157.6b8a75ca@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120907181717.GS5282@gentoo.org> References: <1338845178.23212.1.camel@belkin4> <20120906090144.GS74867@gentoo.org> <5048A461.6080903@gentoo.org> <20120907171308.GP5282@gentoo.org> <504A341C.1080207@gentoo.org> <20120907181717.GS5282@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Lfk0gdpOya0c_675Oue4JHh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a34efb5d-0bfa-4297-b839-7009ea713b82 X-Archives-Hash: 0d01cf4fe64a27a3e6c6ea766319a324 --Sig_/Lfk0gdpOya0c_675Oue4JHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 20:17:17 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > Eh, no. Now it just always breaks when you perform a downgrade, and > revdev-rebuild or @preserved-libs won't help you. I prefer that you > give best practices how to use sub-slots to make Portage also able to > do a recompile of bar when libfnord in the same SLOT gets downgraded. > (Because minors are used for compatible changes -- additions -- to the > ABI.) Downgrades aren't covered by sub-slots, slots, regular dependencies, libtool, or anything else. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/Lfk0gdpOya0c_675Oue4JHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBKO0gACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFjNQCglE7hpdYidthgfe2up8uxrQT6 7W8AoMiyOWOEI6BM4HLQlT4sKDmMyog+ =XnYb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Lfk0gdpOya0c_675Oue4JHh--