From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFB2138010 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E78CC21C02A; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71662E059B for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (213-238-104-238.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.104.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBE9D33C9F5; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 15:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:16:21 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept Message-ID: <20120907171621.779a10eb@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20120907160754.4f65b880@googlemail.com> References: <20120907124559.68a1b88d@googlemail.com> <20120907142941.0c2a7197@pomiocik.lan> <20120907133605.62441885@googlemail.com> <20120907162316.6255818b@pomiocik.lan> <20120907155350.3b238e0c@googlemail.com> <20120907170257.77f3fda3@pomiocik.lan> <20120907160754.4f65b880@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/fYFMTNrjTadHgAUlEYcSn/y"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 42339281-cb9e-4f15-b7eb-6fb841502e2c X-Archives-Hash: 1e93413ce2e92afb503fcde75dfc4212 --Sig_/fYFMTNrjTadHgAUlEYcSn/y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:07:54 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:02:57 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > The problem is that you're arguing against a proposal that doesn't > > > exist except in your head. If you'd like to read and understand > > > the proposal being made, which starts with understanding the bits > > > marked clearly with stars, and then once you've understood it, > > > rethink and present any issues you find with that proposal then > > > we might have something to discuss. > >=20 > > Renaming and/or reordering something doesn't change its > > implications. It's just 'main disadvantage' vs 'side disadvantage'. >=20 > Well no. You've been arguing against some mysterious proposal that > doesn't exist that you think is about replacing lots of variables with > one variable. That's not what DEPENDENCIES is, and now that you've got > a proper write-up, you can try reading it, understanding it and then > seeing if you have any objections to what's actually being proposed. Ah, I forgot how the goals change *everything*. Because it's good to kill hundreds of people for the good reasons. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/fYFMTNrjTadHgAUlEYcSn/y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlBKD8YACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1mOwP9HJviPmbTu3e67atvqFCii53t yF+kwU/x9xKVObXfXxoyNdyIpU/GcZEaMsmu/3z2lRr7o17i9fp5i0+Otuo5gC0F zdpo15HT6WVqsURn6yKWKwOuSWurRm9XdYgDlHs8EADQyNZElhlJtrHCxIhnzX0F 35Ygl1sDveBI31yMGhI= =qqLt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fYFMTNrjTadHgAUlEYcSn/y--