From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C5C138010 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 551AB21C063; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:17:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (unknown [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404B9E0698 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyt57 with SMTP id t57so1903152wey.40 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:13:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=AA7b8oGYLQaBCzcQ97w+Ysmjvvj9B/TzQ1SWqPU29kY=; b=GQGinuQd9OAJhCdyoSIWb5c5L3qrGsEIzJ5C/bgyg+ydhlOZnKuQeY4eRIs8osIc76 oOYtgZ3Hrl1iySpIMdxf7zSkuCo0PDQPX878hj+gsxiBPxvrZ6i/DnMxvE8JlhoN481x D/CfOoZQJ2hNtVIbbsaaZmdLBe3ujnckSGMfHffuurtVwbYGGXpJb5E9JLKPf6X5NtnF 8r/Q4W8Sh1tnAJZizsrvVl4V5Irbr+hsgx5yAy1+21z4OAQG42jbubJ8BMGVdyn5waL5 TZANikd8THGVG6w4acHPMgDxpnNMO1kelDJimM5KHqBwhciJC0u5Rnee3dj98SR81UxZ cYDw== Received: by 10.180.91.1 with SMTP id ca1mr47527279wib.8.1347034390432; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:13:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eu4sm10306775wib.2.2012.09.07.09.13.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:13:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:10:59 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept Message-ID: <20120907171059.525eea36@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120907124641.0135693d@gentoo.org> References: <20120907124559.68a1b88d@googlemail.com> <20120907124641.0135693d@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/Q1A9P6+tsCbcRSqu0LbXqCB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 1807c0c9-4d6f-463b-bbd4-c04ea7e0b949 X-Archives-Hash: 66d241796fa5f080f15482174bd7a5a2 --Sig_/Q1A9P6+tsCbcRSqu0LbXqCB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 12:46:41 -0300 Alexis Ballier wrote: > For example, what is the HDEPEND equivalent for DEPENDENCIES ? exherbo > documentation doesn't seem to mention an equivalent label. DEPENDENCIES is essentially independent of what label names we introduce. I get the impression Gentoo will be bikeshedding, er, I mean selecting shorter names for some of the labels than what Exherbo is using. So HDEPEND could be 'host' if you like. In any case, the reason you don't see a 'host' label on Exherbo is because it's called 'build'. Exherbo's taken a more comprehensive approach to handling ROOT-related dependencies -- dependency resolution for ROOT!=3D/ still uses / for satisfying not-purely-runtimeish dependencies, and then has a way of locking versions on / to versions in ROOT. It does rely upon having a fully-ROOT-and-/-aware resolver, though, so it may not be suitable for Gentoo. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/Q1A9P6+tsCbcRSqu0LbXqCB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBKHJYACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEsfgCfX+SUS2z76ZK0WEnbEDDTUkhN CSwAoJGKRvim3MSiiuCC64Es/Xzmw+Pc =QoU6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Q1A9P6+tsCbcRSqu0LbXqCB--