From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D1F138010 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC354E08D1; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:34:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32B9E07FA for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 08:33:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so853898wib.10 for ; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 01:33:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=qgLLbFMFNymsUyBPRfm8cSa5dJ2iZmMQZ7iTbi+hAlc=; b=CHOmncpgLl22M/ZL7avlkeu0c/RKD7SITehFj0HCir4VlON9E10pYehntXEfIK3bi1 zfb+jTBmkGEBAbjRLidYQp7p46pn51vENKbhczR+K/4/hVYVxD4+bfiXPBMhz5XSncng hL0aDx6/bSHcyjvCBplPDUM+keJpiELF8jXQXHuoRBSol18XFuxrIVNAvc7TUKl6CpIk NTxG/8nKcsyNMxFs5R93RvsubRpcMNJbIPhetTqZL8wlYk2txURCcpJrccRgSODwEmZO IK1NyxFAK3eHQJLfQP0V8i/nKSXKSOafK2bGMcXrsu0rz7US8x0cHmkd7dG9VRgk0N+q F2/w== Received: by 10.216.255.18 with SMTP id i18mr834415wes.45.1346920407179; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 01:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b7sm4215312wiz.9.2012.09.06.01.33.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 06 Sep 2012 01:33:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 09:31:29 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] HDEPEND (host dependencies for cross-compilation) for EAPI 5? Message-ID: <20120906093129.6a37147f@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120906102755.7cf36ca5@pomiocik.lan> References: <50411874.4060204@gentoo.org> <20120831214611.088b3f50@googlemail.com> <50469795.2070901@gentoo.org> <20120905181543.5394051e@pomiocik.lan> <20120906065851.4d20e750@googlemail.com> <20120906093925.77ca0854@pomiocik.lan> <20120906090040.11c07981@googlemail.com> <20120906102755.7cf36ca5@pomiocik.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/a_Zdv75_k1ZxXa46S4FHub_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a2212626-e6b1-4dfd-a188-99a79d155fc8 X-Archives-Hash: dedf9e6496e05600539b246b2d8d1455 --Sig_/a_Zdv75_k1ZxXa46S4FHub_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:27:55 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > But what I was saying is that I dislike the implicit 'no label =3D=3D > build+run'. It's unclear, very unclear. >=20 > Why the heck: >=20 > ( foo/bar ) >=20 > introduces another label than: >=20 > use? ( foo/bar ) >=20 > ? Labels are propagated into child blocks, so it doesn't introduce a new label. I think you've misunderstood something here... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/a_Zdv75_k1ZxXa46S4FHub_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBIX2UACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHWHwCg0YOSYPzkpKgpIzN/P8O4n6dJ HvUAoLb88ddKGYpcQD2o5a2/MSReo3Kb =9no+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/a_Zdv75_k1ZxXa46S4FHub_--