From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499FF138010 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A462E083B; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342F2E06B3 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (213-238-104-238.adsl.inetia.pl [213.238.104.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4A3433D734; Wed, 5 Sep 2012 10:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:07:03 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ulm@gentoo.org, ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Future EAPI] src_fetch() phase function to support VCS fetching Message-ID: <20120905120703.53f861f7@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20551.5728.103799.115848@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20120904184345.77696965@pomiocik.lan> <20120904192351.0da21f43@pomiocik.lan> <20120905082554.4bfb7452@googlemail.com> <20120905103811.6e9e2e79@pomiocik.lan> <20551.5728.103799.115848@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA256; boundary="Sig_/dKnatNqnUdndCTA78C/GIDl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 80434e11-2a0d-4c76-b355-2f39add1a8cb X-Archives-Hash: 113d29906a596c4c36bf08c421080e10 --Sig_/dKnatNqnUdndCTA78C/GIDl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 5 Sep 2012 11:07:44 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > And yes, it is *very* unlikely that someone uses a slotted live > > ebuild with two branches being meaningful and managed in the same > > repo. >=20 > We do that all the time for app-editors/emacs-vcs. For example, we > used to have live ebuilds for the trunk and for the emacs-24 branch, > sharing a common repository. Doesn't bzr actually work alike git? i.e. keep all commits when switching branches? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/dKnatNqnUdndCTA78C/GIDl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEIAAYFAlBHJEgACgkQfXuS5UK5QB1aTQQAoC/OCJ8OY0nYtjVC7CXONM91 IvFT+eYfWsa/WtGnq0QEOSijh6xY2dEa0fO8kQ9nukq3ET8rI+ACJqUK0B69jUod QJOqHBFEYBUh1y9eFulA2umijYl7sSl947Ml3qd6RVr7F0eCc4XLXlZ+AKr8nXma paULNSwNlJFT80jzLmQ= =QPUY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dKnatNqnUdndCTA78C/GIDl--