From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32B8138010 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE1B5E04BA; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA66EE01C9 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 18:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhm2 with SMTP id hm2so2296842wib.10 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=Zi365pQbHWy5nB2E59V3dEuA/ZHxiZuaUlQs/ryM4PI=; b=b3Y039rnMNbDXPKxxBDSP1NxpILMsZvRQbnTStsc/KqWM+s1qsOxTGVjbSUg1siVjT 3jf+Cjlw0lKeYSP+reTjx86BNbg0IpolOtDQ1upDP29HqJbaPx5ngsWyri3OQCcweyfj lxhNS4EhIo3+/VpbjWZMeJ+TwjY+zNbI+ynL6J8PlDOu+vLEHf1+py8QqsYAQesbc6M8 668oYdSUqCzJPXeOuqlX7/ogj2iQ22IPjuo6Icu7EUYxnihX6PoeDsncUitr2ehrr87Z RGafuFnnP2gBs4LBiv7sIXVm3KMC1rUn/T85vcSQRXTNy62AkyWIDf56TLaaSwbEwPQl qwDg== Received: by 10.216.132.25 with SMTP id n25mr7796008wei.25.1346609058073; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:04:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t7sm21245190wix.6.2012.09.02.11.04.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Sep 2012 11:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:02:26 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI usage Message-ID: <20120902190226.6bb1440f@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <50434AFB.9010503@gentoo.org> References: <50434AFB.9010503@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/B640K3v_jfDIkk+1XrV/2.D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 7d4f4966-f3ef-4b92-9edc-29fbb7207897 X-Archives-Hash: 18485122132c0ec7ba08d8a368653c62 --Sig_/B640K3v_jfDIkk+1XrV/2.D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 14:03:07 +0200 hasufell wrote: > global epatch_user has a downside which I think was not even really > discussed here unless I missed something. It could introduce many > bogus bug reports which are caused by user-applied patches, cause > it's easier now and you don't need to do it in an overlay. > The maintainer will need to catch this and asking which repo the > bugreporter did use is not sufficient. He will need the build log and > check if user patches got applied there. No, it's not a downside. It's an advantage: user patches will get applied correctly now, and in a way visible to the package mangler, and thus can be shown consistently in bug reports. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/B640K3v_jfDIkk+1XrV/2.D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBDnzUACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHiMgCggF5QXDwtTyPUxZieO5Mq/8cS 0iIAn2rxDWjXskMJ8lkvd5tOrj23hIGH =AkyK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/B640K3v_jfDIkk+1XrV/2.D--