On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 16:03:25 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > > I think SDEPEND is a much simpler approach to the issue, why > > introducing a new kind of USE flags to address what really belongs > > to *DEPEND? > > I guess we could combine the two ideas if we allow USE conditionals > inside SDEPEND. But you don't want to do that... The point of suggestions is that they can be considered on their own merits. -- Ciaran McCreesh