From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D1B138010 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DCD3E0504; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com (mail-ob0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D74E00AB for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 15:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so3160102obb.40 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=t2s6LUw22Fw6F2ZsUdTJJZd9ptYwpOXCP4vPuNSDPHM=; b=oQ/Qi6MO7Hz7ro17+AekborqvUXRycNueT75JXQL/1wNRn4oj9j7/TME6lbu0reO6h 3IlUvrk2aGPIajBSpXHCAL3LukhGsgyvRmxDgCKtgTWUs8+bLMwus2u51hayvmaPHboM 8q6VOeV6fnTSMhqVupQJ2OymEDXtQ/gz7t323Nv93pBbjcZ2cC/uCve8hb90s4V6XWsM 2nn0NM9MOQKwVBg9+7zIJKRLs1GxzOAFv3wtNMC5/cEUJib3Go0+YDtlVnMhBXfHiBcs Qe8iauGIA0gQ81G+unHQG5zMjsI0hR2/1TgQIYZD6R6UD9y5kB1y/JJSDUVSrB0auBwH hPgg== Received: by 10.60.31.165 with SMTP id b5mr6410724oei.58.1345909997202; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-95-170.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.95.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jl8sm12199489obb.18.2012.08.25.08.53.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 25 Aug 2012 08:53:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:53:14 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:53:14 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: heroxbd@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: OpenRC network provides revisited Message-ID: <20120825155314.GA3790@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, heroxbd@gentoo.org References: <20120824171010.GA27765@linux1> <86y5l3vrpw.fsf@gentoo.org> <20120824234820.GA1944@linux1> <503828C7.6000607@gentoo.org> <20120825035726.GA2354@linux1> <864nnrv6hf.fsf@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <864nnrv6hf.fsf@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 24bc8bab-4b9f-4c0e-b7fa-1e01bc701127 X-Archives-Hash: 5565d740c814db16bac6bc49b565e91d --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 03:19:24PM +0900, heroxbd@gentoo.org wrote: > If we set rc_provide="net" in rc.conf, the services that need net can be > tricked as we intended to. Setting rc_provide, rc_need, rc_use, etc in rc.conf is definitely not recommended. Remember that this affects all services on your system. when you set rc_provide="net" in rc.conf, you are saying that every service on your system provides net. William --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlA49OoACgkQblQW9DDEZTjLSQCgnTclY5oXbZEmA9xkL4pYpvxH QWcAnjRtyZG5qDcSVE7zIhjOEOvHZjm6 =THe0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--