From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DBC1381F4 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53F7B21C051; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (mail-we0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5744221C038 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 19:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by weyt57 with SMTP id t57so1412374wey.40 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:27:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=Ohjm2zA1DfHCIMoxgUv4OJnUa0a0RCAPxRNI0f9ekEU=; b=D3CUnFuDbgviDhoQ8GKYlGe8JVn6kpgoTgpp3zmTffkeFSIn8NNIcti7tTiXEha1oC 69geDgClTvOnMeWKxluYf+Dn/PKU3NTvap80mw1ZebtgVGbzRNQ1RGD1JHX93bRJ0oPm v/KpryNhlXbJEs7SL1EFbjscPOCjI3o3vSk/Li4Z8pNdT/QgijQMJbpekyoasKiEWjq1 T9nzpbsZ3xqFhRUCqD3VRYTTH5ydoRiNl/sxlA3dRZkq+L003mAWpdux3u/0low+k2os KIs4RYNN6wBnJfaSQ1v4p68EWcdWe9K6hbo0obJs+2vAapcz6Z3Fs5+n+37XbkeQ7Isn /eLA== Received: by 10.180.79.69 with SMTP id h5mr39307659wix.6.1345058860354; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:27:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bc2sm7072420wib.0.2012.08.15.12.27.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:27:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:26:18 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Questions about SystemD and OpenRC Message-ID: <20120815202618.611fbcca@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1344366029.24762.31.camel@TesterTop4> <502377E7.8010803@gentoo.org> <1344535966.2121.6.camel@TesterTop4> <20120809183130.GA6795@linux1> <20120809195727.5d04ccff@googlemail.com> <20120814032416.GA8489@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.11; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/sAFFwgdE9m6SuV58SVoLC2t"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 78be7e1a-e75c-434f-8efa-3e06fe0a0bf6 X-Archives-Hash: e4f5af1c76f2d63160587c6aed9d671f --Sig_/sAFFwgdE9m6SuV58SVoLC2t Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 15:18:24 -0400 Michael Mol wrote: > I've occasionally noticed portage tell me about circular dependencies, > where the most straight forward resolution is to emerge some package > in the loop twice. The first time, with a USE flag disabled (avahi and > gtk are the usual suspects), and the second time with the USE flag > enabled. >=20 > In circumstances where it's necessary to do something like that to > reach a final desired system state, I'm not sure I see any problem > with portage automatically doing the two-stage emerge. That's going to be rather horrible when your package mangler "temporarily" turns off acl or turns on build... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/sAFFwgdE9m6SuV58SVoLC2t Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAr990ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHocgCg24SiSNzCiiTs0EUKj+S9K7XR aM8AoJu9fF5s0XmCGYPXm08Pa+mQ5BP2 =mUEV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/sAFFwgdE9m6SuV58SVoLC2t--