From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54053-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E80B1381F4
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:20:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CCC7E0B82;
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:20:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f53.google.com (mail-yw0-f53.google.com [209.85.213.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED556E0C0D
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:18:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yhp3 with SMTP id 3so1958294yhp.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
:user-agent;
bh=0qxayCkWHKioIGnKTBzNdlcHTJL6PbIR/Fin4wzQYlI=;
b=icEJx5onHUeCCzi60pqt157G5PMULDbhlqZAS6QTEkhfmTjxVkbmh2NV8M46mUWXrk
9qG6696FV5eqpHjXMjX7uH9IUhpKA9kBjyAfexYhWSxgvxSAlA1NuZWfXbiK4lpmzubt
3IAfcw/xjNX0yL2BAGP0UJvM2xfNVe0cvdy9+phlXOA+ZIavkOsthLVoaQFOzXGDHAlr
JWHicFu61q2AYsmD970Fggf6ryMh1BiPP4lWzXOIAnMx/MAhYKc3+eu8Ym+Bx7O0m5fF
LdwH9LoVNcBPcZn/jc4czRyMjgRLLc1zIX5l8mQD/MjGjWe+kz1JDoUVVh+LiXTdRoMv
sI1A==
Received: by 10.60.27.6 with SMTP id p6mr1378473oeg.37.1345033130015;
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-95-170.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.95.170])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k3sm1288177obw.4.2012.08.15.05.18.47
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Wed, 15 Aug 2012 05:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@gmail.com>
Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:18:47 -0500
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:18:47 -0500
From: William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Questions about SystemD and OpenRC
Message-ID: <20120815121847.GA16773@linux1>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1344535966.2121.6.camel@TesterTop4>
<20120809183130.GA6795@linux1>
<CADPrc82tAN0p9kbQUSySHFMH4500n_J4M80y2ROEkah=bpcSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20120809195727.5d04ccff@googlemail.com>
<CADPrc80c22XW2gfQ_QHgzRORQfDcTuer1iai9_kuE=cHrOAvZg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGfcS_kxg98UvRmXN1J2vyvatQ87xV6HiJgKYoEF3tuHWJOUpg@mail.gmail.com>
<20120814032416.GA8489@kroah.com>
<CAGfcS_kkXF+JDu3Y1Fv+7JL+fiedx+UPyoRva-KCXZcMDbpCsQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CADPrc81Ytn9+MuGtxsmzosct=gK==vP_Jw4ew262f_WYtOEZWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAGfcS_kBy1u6AjTiGn8vtrB8pqO3A966pzMxkHJGM6Z5JqJE_g@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_kBy1u6AjTiGn8vtrB8pqO3A966pzMxkHJGM6Z5JqJE_g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Archives-Salt: 07d02070-0ac0-4ba5-b97c-e03a6ae1b4bd
X-Archives-Hash: e0b397deed62639730a55ac72f2b8948
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 06:27:41AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> RE you concerns about OpenRC being in @system. Personally I'm a fan
> of getting rid of @system entirely except as something used to build
> install CDs or having some sets for convenience in building systems.
> It only exists for a few reasons that I can think of:
> 1. Devs don't want to have ebuilds that capture dependencies on every
> little thing. A few well-chosen virtuals like "shell utilities" or
> whatever might help with this.
> 2. Things like Prefix rely on the system not installing local copies
> of libraries in the core system it needs to link to. Careful use of
> package.provided in profiles might address this.
> 3. We'd need many more virtuals to handle situations like FreeBSD
> where people don't what GNU on their systems. Right now if they are
> system packages they just define system appropriately and ebuilds
> don't directly pull in the GNU stuff anyway.
>=20
> I'm sure there could be others. Keep in mind that systemd is still
> pretty new and largely out-of-the-blue so it will take time for Gentoo
> to adjust to it. Right now OpenRC might install executables, but
> nothing should be actually running them - this is just wasted
> compilation time which isn't a bad interim state to be in. If
> virtualizing udev is causing controversy just wait until somebody
> actually makes a push to remove OpenRC from @system...
This isn't in the plans. OpenRC gets installed everywhere right now,
because it is a pdepend of baselayout. The plan is actually to tie it to
a virtual which will be added to @system; I just haven't gotten around
to doing this yet. [1]
William
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D409385
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlArk6cACgkQblQW9DDEZTiBlwCeOg9BlcOsKuiQpNK+pNaDI+QQ
rkcAni1qEawA7/LMvHXeGrJMgBPMWPVK
=jr9P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--