From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-54052-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E9E1381F4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5E37E0B7B;
	Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:02:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hera.cwi.nl (hera.cwi.nl [192.16.191.8])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06249E0B6A
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 12:01:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gentoo.org (sofia.ins.cwi.nl [192.16.196.188]) by hera.cwi.nl with ESMTP
	id q7FC1V1h002955 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:01:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:01:31 +0200
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Questions about SystemD and OpenRC
Message-ID: <20120815120131.GY10705@gentoo.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <CAGfcS_kxg98UvRmXN1J2vyvatQ87xV6HiJgKYoEF3tuHWJOUpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120814032416.GA8489@kroah.com>
 <CAGfcS_kkXF+JDu3Y1Fv+7JL+fiedx+UPyoRva-KCXZcMDbpCsQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADPrc81Ytn9+MuGtxsmzosct=gK==vP_Jw4ew262f_WYtOEZWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGfcS_kBy1u6AjTiGn8vtrB8pqO3A966pzMxkHJGM6Z5JqJE_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120815125832.39c72a82@pomiocik.lan>
 <20120815110757.GV10705@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_=erdwEE9sqCQKc4g-Kv1ogvgvW4_E0kjKWg9XSgzKOGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120815114153.GX10705@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_=se2AVk8Hiqeb92F62muDnN_2Dq9CJG-u4NfsYb70WzA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0btr6/5+bhBdui6J"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_=se2AVk8Hiqeb92F62muDnN_2Dq9CJG-u4NfsYb70WzA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (Darwin 9.8.0, VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3)
Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc.
X-Archives-Salt: ee5bb284-03b4-43fb-9084-2c588550ae63
X-Archives-Hash: e404ea467f7e180471f25b35ca0ed4f5


--0btr6/5+bhBdui6J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 15-08-2012 07:50:42 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 7:41 AM, Fabian Groffen <grobian@gentoo.org> wrot=
e:
> > There are only a few packages I've seen that depend on a certain
> > (min/max) version of glibc, and when in use for Prefix, mostly use
> >   "!prefix? ( elibc_glibc? ( ...) )"
> > stuff at the moment.
>=20
> Half the packages in portage link to libc, though they don't actually
> declare this dependency due to the policy of not declaring policies in
> @system.  If you got rid of @system then they'd need to declare them.

Yeah, so just don't do that.


--=20
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

--0btr6/5+bhBdui6J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAlArj5sACgkQX3X2B8XHTonCmACbBkVzGjSu2dk1V5PrcNNkzWQp
9uoAoJuLS7OQWLji1+luO25sABvNcmND
=Wfq/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--0btr6/5+bhBdui6J--